Re: [Xen-API] [PATCH v2 4/6] Add Code Review Guide

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

On 28.11.2019 14:06, Lars Kurth wrote:
> I can certainly add something on the timing , along the lines of
> * For complex series, consider the time it takes to do reviews (maybe with a 
> guide of LOC per hour) and give reviewers enough time to
> * For series with design issues or large questions, try and highlight the key 
> open issues in cover letters clearly and solicit feedback from key 
> maintainers who can comment on the open issue. The idea is to save both the 
> contributor and the reviewers time by focussing on what needs to be resolved 
> * Don’t repost a series, unless all review comments are addressed
> or the reviewers asked you to do so. The problem with this is that
> this is somewhat in conflict with the "let's focus on the core
> issues and not get distracted by details early on in a review cycle".
> In other words, this can only work, if reviewers focus on major
> issues in early reviews only and do not focus on style, coding
> standards, etc.

But this doesn't make much sense either, because then full re-reviews
need to happen anyway on later versions, to also deal with the minor
issues. For RFC kind of series omitting style and alike feedback
certainly makes sense, but as soon as a patch is non-RFC, it should
be considered good to go in by the submitter.

Jan

_______________________________________________
Xen-api mailing list
Xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-api