Re: [Xen-API] Adoption of storage-ci repository

[Mate Lakat <mate.lakat@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Jon,

The CI scripts were placed to a separate repository, because they have a 
different reason for change, and they had to change at a different rate. 
Consider it as a testing "framework". Also, some functions are used both for 
testing blktap and sm.

Cheers,
Mate

-----Original Message-----
From: xen-api-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-api-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Jon Ludlam
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 1:58 PM
To: xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Germano Percossi
Subject: Re: [Xen-API] Adoption of storage-ci repository

On 29/09/14 16:24, Dave Scott wrote:
> On 29 Sep 2014, at 16:13, Mate Lakat <mate.lakat@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> I would like to introduce a repository:
>>
>>  https://github.com/matelakat/storage-ci
>>
>> This repository contains scripts that enable anyone to run the 
>> unittests related to two repositories:
>>
>> - https://github.com/xen-api/blktap
>> - https://github.com/xen-api/sm
>>
>> Our CI system runs those scripts on each pull request at the moment. 
>> I want that repository to be adopted by the xapi-project, because it 
>> is strongly coupled to those projects.
>>
>> Let me know your thoughts.
> This sounds useful to me, especially if it allows me to replicate what the 
> pull request CI is doing.
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
>
(CCing Germano and Thanos for their input.)

Agreed. One thing I'm wondering though is why the scripts aren't in the 
repositories themselves rather than being a separate repo?

Cheers,

Jon


_______________________________________________
Xen-api mailing list
Xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api

_______________________________________________
Xen-api mailing list
Xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api