[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-API] [MirageOS-devel] xen dev summit talk slides: Branch Consistency for Xenstore
Thanks Felipe! (Huici and Manco :-) Terrible wifi at the dev summit this year, so it was difficult to share more information in real time. best, Anil On 20 Aug 2014, at 04:05, Felipe Huici <Felipe.Huici@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Anil, all, > > As a clarification, the talk was given by my colleague Filipe Manco, in > cc, not me. I’ve temporarily placed the slides at: > > http://www0.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/f.huici/presentations/clickos-xendevsummit14 > .pdf > > They should appear on the Xen summit briefly, and more permanently on our > website at: > > https://cnp.neclab.eu > > Thanks, > > — Felipe > > ============================================================ > Dr. Felipe Huici > Senior Researcher, Networked Systems and Data > Analytics Group > NEC Laboratories Europe, Network Research Division > Kurfuerstenanlage 36, D-69115 Heidelberg > Tel. +49 > (0)6221 4342-241 > Fax: +49 > (0)6221 4342-155 > > e-mail: > felipe.huici@xxxxxxxxx > ============================================================ > NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 > Victoria Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 2832014 > > > > > On 8/19/14, 3:47 PM, "Anil Madhavapeddy" <anil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 19 Aug 2014, at 08:44, Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> On 17 Aug 2014, at 11:01, Anil Madhavapeddy <anil@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm giving a talk at the Xen Developer Summit at Linuxcon tomorrow on >>>> the work that we've (primarily Dave Scott and Thomas Gazagnaire) on >>>> improving the Xenstore via Irmin features. >>>> >>>> Slides here: http://decks.openmirage.org/xendevsummit14#/ >>>> Repo: https://github.com/mirage/mirage-decks as usual >>>> >>> >>> [+xen-api-devel] Talk went well, quick notes here: >>> >>> - git workflow very popular. Lots of people twigged onto the >>> maintainability benefits of `git bisect` automation in particular. >>> >>> - questions about why Xenstore transactions are still necessary in the >>> modern world. Can replace with consensus protocols instead? Maybe time >>> for an ABI bump to deprecate the ancient xenstore protocol. >>> >>> - space usage is a concern -- building an RRD-style constant size >>> library to maintain progressive history would be a big win. >>> >>> - *excellent* talk from Felipe Huici (CCed) from NEC about building >>> much denser VM workloads, and he observed that Xenstored/xenconsoled are >>> a big bottleneck at ~10000 VMs. Are your slides available Felipe? Some >>> sub notes: >>> >>> - we could write a mirage xenconsoled to log to irmin and drain guest >>> console rings much faster. >>> - a distributed xenstored+irmin would allow significantly more >>> scalability than attempting to build a serially fast version. >>> - felipe has the beginning of a simple c++ xenstored that doesn't >>> implement the full semantics, but is enough for MiniOS. >>> - it may be useful to negotiate a xenstore v2 protocol and use that for >>> new guests. It could use a simple fixed-length binary protocol >>> (protobuf-style?), and eliminate the need for transactions perhaps. >> >> sent 'send' too quickly. The most important point: >> >> - xenstore need consistent indices. Using domain names in the current >> stack results in a linear search through all domids -- very slow with >> 10000 VMs! Irmin could maintain a branch that updates a 'name -> domid' >> that is consistent within the transaction, and do constant time lookups >> for the toolstack. >> >> -anil >> > _______________________________________________ Xen-api mailing list Xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |