[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-API] The vdi is not available
I don't get why it's not mounting with the uuid subdir. It should.
On our pool:
Jul 25 10:13:39 xen-blade10 SM: [30890] ['mount.nfs',
'10.50.50.11:/storage/nfs1/cc744878-9d79-37df-98cb-cd88eebdab61',
'/var/run/sr-mount/cc744878-9d79-37df-98cb-cd88eebdab61', '-o',
'soft,timeo=133,retrans=2147483647,tcp,actimeo=0']
as a temporary dirty fix you could try:
umount /var/run/sr-mount/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206
mount.nfs 10.254.253.9:/xen/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206 -o
soft,timeo=133,retrans=2147483647,tcp,noac
to manually remount it correctly
On 25.07.2013 18:48, Andres E. Moya wrote:
I restarted and tried to unplug and got the same message, here is the grep
[root@nj-xen-04 ~]# grep mount.nfs /var/log/SMlog
[31636] 2013-07-24 16:43:54.140961 ['mount.nfs',
'10.254.253.9:/secondary',
'/var/run/sr-mount/f21def12-74a2-8fab-1e1c-f41968e889bb', '-o',
'soft,timeo=133,retrans=2147483647,tcp,noac']
[9277] 2013-07-25 12:36:42.416286 ['mount.nfs', '10.254.253.9:/iso',
'/var/run/sr-mount/fbfbf5b3-a37a-288a-86aa-d8d168173f98', '-o',
'soft,timeo=133,retrans=2147483647,tcp,noac']
[9393] 2013-07-25 12:36:43.241531 ['mount.nfs', '10.254.253.9:/xen',
'/var/run/sr-mount/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206', '-o',
'soft,timeo=133,retrans=2147483647,tcp,noac']
----- Original Message -----
From: "SÃbastien RICCIO" <sr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Andres E. Moya" <amoya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 12:29:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Xen-API] The vdi is not available
Okay, in this case try to reboot the server, and take a look if it fixed
the mount.
If not you should "grep mount.nfs /var/log/SMlog" and look what command
line XS use to mount your storage.
On 25.07.2013 18:22, Andres E. Moya wrote:
there are no tasks/ returns empty
Moya Solutions, Inc.
amoya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
0 | 646-918-5238 x 102
F | 646-390-1806
----- Original Message -----
From: "SÃÂbastien RICCIO" <sr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Andres E. Moya" <amoya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 12:20:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Xen-API] The vdi is not available
xe task-list uuid=9c7b7690-a301-41ef-b7d5-d4abd8b70fbc
If it returns something
xe task-cancel uuid=9c7b7690-a301-41ef-b7d5-d4abd8b70fbc
then try again to unplug the pbd
OR
if nothing is running on the server, consider trying a reboot
Sorry this is hard to debug remotely.
On 25.07.2013 18:10, Andres E. Moya wrote:
xe pbd-unplug uuid=a0739a97-408b-afed-7ac2-fe76ffec3ee7
This operation cannot be performed because this VDI is in use by some other
operation
vdi: 96c158d3-2b31-41d1-8287-aa9fb6d5eb6c (Windows Server 2003 0)
operation: 9c7b7690-a301-41ef-b7d5-d4abd8b70fbc (Windows 7 (64-bit) (1) 0)
<extra>: 405f6cce-d750-47e1-aec3-c8f8f3ae6290 (Plesk Management 0)
<extra>: dad9b85a-ee2f-4b48-94f0-79db8dfd78dd (mx5 0)
<extra>: 13b558f8-0c3f-4df9-8766-d8e1306b25d5 (Windows Server 2008 R2 (64-bit)
(1) 0)
this was done on the server that has nothing running on it
Moya Solutions, Inc.
amoya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
0 | 646-918-5238 x 102
F | 646-390-1806
----- Original Message -----
From: "SÃÆÃÂbastien RICCIO" <sr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Andres E. Moya" <amoya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 12:02:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Xen-API] The vdi is not available
This looks correct. You should maybe try to unplug / replug the storage
on server where it's wrong.
for example if it's on nj-xen-03:
pbd-unplug uuid=a0739a97-408b-afed-7ac2-fe76ffec3ee7
then
pbd-plug uuid=a0739a97-408b-afed-7ac2-fe76ffec3ee7
and check if it's then mounted the right way.
On 25.07.2013 17:36, Andres E. Moya wrote:
[root@nj-xen-01 ~]# xe pbd-list sr-uuid=9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206
uuid ( RO) : c53d12f6-c3a6-0ae2-75fb-c67c761b2716
host-uuid ( RO): b8ca0c69-6023-48c5-9b61-bd5871093f4e
sr-uuid ( RO): 9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206
device-config (MRO): serverpath: /xen; options: ; server:
10.254.253.9
currently-attached ( RO): true
uuid ( RO) : a0739a97-408b-afed-7ac2-fe76ffec3ee7
host-uuid ( RO): a464b853-47d7-4756-b9ab-49cb00c5aebb
sr-uuid ( RO): 9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206
device-config (MRO): serverpath: /xen; options: ; server:
10.254.253.9
currently-attached ( RO): true
uuid ( RO) : 6f2c0e7d-fdda-e406-c2e1-d4ef81552b17
host-uuid ( RO): dab9cd1a-7ca8-4441-a78f-445580d851d2
sr-uuid ( RO): 9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206
device-config (MRO): serverpath: /xen; options: ; server:
10.254.253.9
currently-attached ( RO): true
[root@nj-xen-01 ~]# xe host-list
uuid ( RO) : a464b853-47d7-4756-b9ab-49cb00c5aebb
name-label ( RW): nj-xen-03
name-description ( RW): Default install of XenServer
uuid ( RO) : dab9cd1a-7ca8-4441-a78f-445580d851d2
name-label ( RW): nj-xen-04
name-description ( RW): Default install of XenServer
uuid ( RO) : b8ca0c69-6023-48c5-9b61-bd5871093f4e
name-label ( RW): nj-xen-01
name-description ( RW): Default install of XenServer
----- Original Message -----
From: "SÃÆÃâÃâÃÂbastien RICCIO" <sr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Andres E. Moya" <amoya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 11:09:21 AM
Subject: Re: [Xen-API] The vdi is not available
Actually it is right to have:
10.254.253.9:/xen/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206 instead of
10.254.253.9:/xen
That is why on this non-working server your file resides in
/var/run/sr-mount/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206
When you create a NFS SR in XCP and specify for example
10.254.253.9:/xen as share to use, it will first create a directory on
the share with the id of the SR (9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206)
and then it remounts 10.254.253.9:/xen/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206.
What is strange is that if your servers are in a pool they should share
the same mount path. Are they all in the same pool ?
Can you please post the results of a :
xe pbd-list sr-uuid=9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206
and a
xe host-list
thanks
On 25.07.2013 16:51, Andres E. Moya wrote:
the mounts are not the same, but what is odd is that the servers that have it
working correctly, actually seem to be mounting incorrectly?
please see below
the servers that are working correctly have
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 4.0G 2.1G 1.7G 56% /
none 373M 20K 373M 1% /dev/shm
10.254.253.9:/xen/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206
25T 127G 25T 1%
/var/run/sr-mount/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206
10.254.253.9:/iso 25T 127G 25T 1%
/var/run/sr-mount/fbfbf5b3-a37a-288a-86aa-d8d168173f98
//10.254.254.30/share
196G 26G 160G 14%
/var/run/sr-mount/fc63fc27-89ca-dbc8-228d-27e3c74779bb
and the one that doesnt work has it in
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda1 4.0G 2.0G 1.8G 54% /
none 373M 24K 373M 1% /dev/shm
//10.254.254.30/share
196G 26G 160G 14%
/var/run/sr-mount/fc63fc27-89ca-dbc8-228d-27e3c74779bb
10.254.253.9:/xen 25T 126G 25T 1%
/var/run/sr-mount/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206
10.254.253.9:/iso 25T 126G 25T 1%
/var/run/sr-mount/fbfbf5b3-a37a-288a-86aa-d8d168173f98
----- Original Message -----
From: "SÃÆÃâÃâÃââÃÆÃâÅÃâÃÂbastien RICCIO" <sr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Andres E. Moya" <amoya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 10:38:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Xen-API] The vdi is not available
Okay I think you got something here.
do a df -h on each server to check the mount path for the SR on them.
Looks like one or more of your servers mounted it wrong.
/var/run/sr-mount/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/
this is not supposed to happen :(
On 25.07.2013 16:31, Andres E. Moya wrote:
I actually just took a look and in the the servers where everything is working
correctly everything is under
/var/run/sr-mount/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/
and on the one that complains that it cant find the file, the file is actually
located in
/var/run/sr-mount/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/
it's as if it is mounting the storage repository within itself.
how can i check if thin provisioning is enabled?
----- Original Message -----
From: "SÃÆÃâÃâÃââÃÆÃâ ÃÂÃâÂÃâÂÃÆÃâÃÂÃâÂÃÂÃÆÃâÅÃâÃÂbastien RICCIO"
<sr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Andres E. Moya" <amoya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "xen-api" <xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Alberto Castrillo"
<castrillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 10:21:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Xen-API] The vdi is not available
According to:
[25610] 2013-07-25 09:51:46.036917 ***** generic exception: vdi_attach:
EXCEPTION SR.SROSError, The VDI is not available
[opterr=/var/run/sr-mount/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/72ad514a-f1f8-4a34-9907-9c6a3506520b.raw
not found]
[16462] 2013-07-25 10:02:49.485672 ['/usr/sbin/td-util', 'query', 'vhd',
'-vpf',
'/var/run/sr-mount/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/72ad514a-f1f8-4a34-9907-9c6a3506520b.vhd']
there is something wrong. It looks it tries to open a .raw file instead
of .vhd.
Maybe one of your server has been installed selecting the "thin
provisionning" feature and the others servers not ?
As far as I know thin provisioning uses vhd, non thin provisioning uses raw.
So if you have mixed installations that will not work when using a
shared storage between them.
My guess is that if you create VM on one server it will create a .vhd
image, and on the other a .raw image.
I can't be 100% certain as I've always used thin provisionning.
You maybe can check if you have mixed raw/vhd in
/var/run/sr-mount/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/
On 25.07.2013 16:04, Andres E. Moya wrote:
this was trying to start up the vm
[25610] 2013-07-25 09:51:45.997895 lock: acquired
/var/lock/sm/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/sr
[25610] 2013-07-25 09:51:46.035698 Raising exception [46, The VDI is not
available
[opterr=/var/run/sr-mount/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/72ad514a-f1f8-4a34-9907-9c6a3506520b.raw
not found]]
[25610] 2013-07-25 09:51:46.035831 lock: released
/var/lock/sm/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/sr
[25610] 2013-07-25 09:51:46.036917 ***** generic exception: vdi_attach:
EXCEPTION SR.SROSError, The VDI is not available
[opterr=/var/run/sr-mount/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/72ad514a-f1f8-4a34-9907-9c6a3506520b.raw
not found]
File "/opt/xensource/sm/SRCommand.py", line 96, in run
return self._run_locked(sr)
File "/opt/xensource/sm/SRCommand.py", line 137, in _run_locked
target = sr.vdi(self.vdi_uuid)
File "/opt/xensource/sm/NFSSR", line 213, in vdi
return NFSFileVDI(self, uuid)
File "/opt/xensource/sm/VDI.py", line 102, in __init__
self.load(uuid)
File "/opt/xensource/sm/FileSR.py", line 370, in load
opterr="%s not found" % self.path)
File "/opt/xensource/sm/xs_errors.py", line 49, in __init__
raise SR.SROSError(errorcode, errormessage)
[25610] 2013-07-25 09:51:46.037204 lock: closed
/var/lock/sm/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/sr
and this is on a migrate(destination)
[29480] 2013-07-25 09:53:18.859918 lock: acquired
/var/lock/sm/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/sr
[29480] 2013-07-25 09:53:18.897479 Raising exception [46, The VDI is not
available
[opterr=/var/run/sr-mount/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/72ad514a-f1f8-4a34-9907-9c6a3506520b.raw
not found]]
[29480] 2013-07-25 09:53:18.897609 lock: released
/var/lock/sm/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/sr
[29480] 2013-07-25 09:53:18.898701 ***** generic exception: vdi_attach:
EXCEPTION SR.SROSError, The VDI is not available
[opterr=/var/run/sr-mount/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/72ad514a-f1f8-4a34-9907-9c6a3506520b.raw
not found]
File "/opt/xensource/sm/SRCommand.py", line 96, in run
return self._run_locked(sr)
File "/opt/xensource/sm/SRCommand.py", line 137, in _run_locked
target = sr.vdi(self.vdi_uuid)
File "/opt/xensource/sm/NFSSR", line 213, in vdi
return NFSFileVDI(self, uuid)
File "/opt/xensource/sm/VDI.py", line 102, in __init__
self.load(uuid)
File "/opt/xensource/sm/FileSR.py", line 370, in load
opterr="%s not found" % self.path)
File "/opt/xensource/sm/xs_errors.py", line 49, in __init__
raise SR.SROSError(errorcode, errormessage)
[29480] 2013-07-25 09:53:18.898972 lock: closed
/var/lock/sm/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/sr
this is on migrate (source)
[16462] 2013-07-25 10:02:48.800862 blktap2.deactivate
[16462] 2013-07-25 10:02:48.800965 lock: acquired
/var/lock/sm/72ad514a-f1f8-4a34-9907-9c6a3506520b/vdi
[16462] 2013-07-25 10:02:48.819441 ['/usr/sbin/tap-ctl', 'close', '-p',
'5578', '-m', '7']
[16462] 2013-07-25 10:02:49.295250 = 0
[16462] 2013-07-25 10:02:49.295467 ['/usr/sbin/tap-ctl', 'detach', '-p',
'5578', '-m', '7']
[16462] 2013-07-25 10:02:49.299579 = 0
[16462] 2013-07-25 10:02:49.299794 ['/usr/sbin/tap-ctl', 'free', '-m', '7']
[16462] 2013-07-25 10:02:49.303645 = 0
[16462] 2013-07-25 10:02:49.303902 tap.deactivate: Shut down
Tapdisk(vhd:/var/run/sr-mount/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/72ad514a-f1f8-4a34-9907-9c6a3506520b.vhd,
pid=5578, minor=7, state=R)
[16462] 2013-07-25 10:02:49.485672 ['/usr/sbin/td-util', 'query', 'vhd',
'-vpf',
'/var/run/sr-mount/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/72ad514a-f1f8-4a34-9907-9c6a3506520b.vhd']
[16462] 2013-07-25 10:02:49.510929 pread SUCCESS
[16462] 2013-07-25 10:02:49.537296 Removed host key
host_OpaqueRef:645996e3-d9cc-59e1-3842-65d679e9e080 for
72ad514a-f1f8-4a34-9907-9c6a3506520b
[16462] 2013-07-25 10:02:49.537451 lock: released
/var/lock/sm/72ad514a-f1f8-4a34-9907-9c6a3506520b/vdi
[16462] 2013-07-25 10:02:49.537540 lock: closed
/var/lock/sm/72ad514a-f1f8-4a34-9907-9c6a3506520b/vdi
[16462] 2013-07-25 10:02:49.537641 lock: closed
/var/lock/sm/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/sr
[16462] 2013-07-25 10:02:49.537862 lock: closed
/var/lock/sm/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/sr
[16636] 2013-07-25 10:02:50.103352 lock: acquired
/var/lock/sm/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/sr
[16636] 2013-07-25 10:02:50.117961 ['/usr/sbin/td-util', 'query', 'vhd',
'-vpf',
'/var/run/sr-mount/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/72ad514a-f1f8-4a34-9907-9c6a3506520b.vhd']
[16636] 2013-07-25 10:02:50.137963 pread SUCCESS
[16636] 2013-07-25 10:02:50.139106 vdi_detach {'sr_uuid':
'9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206', 'subtask_of':
'DummyRef:|ebe0d00f-b082-77ba-b209-095e71a0c1c7|VDI.detach', 'vdi_ref':
'OpaqueRef:31009428-3c98-c005-67ed-ddcc5e432e03', 'vdi_on_boot': 'persist',
'args': [], 'vdi_location': '72ad514a-f1f8-4a34-9907-9c6a3506520b', 'host_ref':
'OpaqueRef:645996e3-d9cc-59e1-3842-65d679e9e080', 'session_ref':
'OpaqueRef:f4170801-402a-0935-a759-19a46e700a87', 'device_config': {'server':
'10.254.253.9', 'SRmaster': 'true', 'serverpath': '/xen', 'options': ''},
'command': 'vdi_detach', 'vdi_allow_caching': 'false', 'sr_ref':
'OpaqueRef:fefba283-7462-1f5a-b4e2-d58169c4b318', 'vdi_uuid':
'72ad514a-f1f8-4a34-9907-9c6a3506520b'}
[16636] 2013-07-25 10:02:50.139415 lock: closed
/var/lock/sm/72ad514a-f1f8-4a34-9907-9c6a3506520b/vdi
[16636] 2013-07-25 10:02:50.139520 lock: released
/var/lock/sm/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/sr
[16636] 2013-07-25 10:02:50.139779 lock: closed
/var/lock/sm/9f9aa794-86c0-9c36-a99d-1e5fdc14a206/sr
[17886] 2013-07-25 10:03:16.326423 sr_scan {'sr_uuid':
'fc63fc27-89ca-dbc8-228d-27e3c74779bb', 'subtask_of':
'DummyRef:|2f34582a-2b3b-82be-b1f6-7f374565c8e8|SR.scan', 'args': [],
'host_ref': 'OpaqueRef:645996e3-d9cc-59e1-3842-65d679e9e080', 'session_ref':
'OpaqueRef:bfffd224-6edc-1cb4-9145-c0c95cbb063b', 'device_config': {'iso_path':
'/iso', 'type': 'cifs', 'SRmaster': 'true', 'location':
'//10.254.254.30/share'}, 'command': 'sr_scan', 'sr_ref':
'OpaqueRef:9c7f5cd0-fd88-16e2-2426-6e066a1183ab'}
----- Original Message -----
From: "SÃÆÃâÃâÃââÃÆÃâ ÃÂÃâÂÃâÂÃÆÃâÃÂÃâÂ
ÃÆÃÂÃÂÃâÅÃÂÃÂÃâÅÃÂÃÆÃâÃâÃââÃÆÃÂÃÂÃâÅÃÂÃâÃÂÃÆÃâÃÂÃâÂÃÂÃÆÃâÅÃâÃÂbastien RICCIO" <sr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Andres E. Moya" <amoya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Alberto Castrillo"
<castrillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "xen-api" <xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 10:55:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Xen-API] The vdi is not available
Hi,
When this happens, what does /var/log/SMlog says ?
Can you please tail -f /var/log/SMlog on both source and destination,
try to migrate the VM and paste the results?
Cheers,
SÃÆÃâÃâÃââÃÆÃâ ÃÂÃâÂÃâÂÃÆÃâÃÂÃâÂ
ÃÆÃÂÃÂÃâÅÃÂÃÂÃâÅÃÂÃÆÃâÃâÃââÃÆÃÂÃÂÃâÅÃÂÃâÃÂÃÆÃâÃÂÃâÂÃÂÃÆÃâÅÃâÃÂbastien
On 24.07.2013 23:09, Andres E. Moya wrote:
I also just tried creating a new storage repository moving the vdi to the new
storage repository is successful, i then try to migrate it to server C and
still have the same issue
Moya Solutions, Inc.
amoya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
0 | 646-918-5238 x 102
F | 646-390-1806
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alberto Castrillo" <castrillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "xen-api" <xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 4:12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Xen-API] The vdi is not available
We use NFS as shared storage, and have faced some "VDI not available" issues
with our VMs. I haven't been able to start a VM with the method of that URL in XCP 1.6
(in 1.1 and 1.5 beta worked). What worked for me:
- Detach the VDI from the VM
- Detach and forget the SR where the VDI is stored
- Reattach the forgotten SR (create new SR, give the same info that the
detached SR, re-use the SR-UUID, ...)
- Reattach the VDI to the VM
El 24/07/2013, a las 21:10, hook escribiÃÆÃâÃâÃââÃÆÃâ ÃÂÃâÂÃâÂÃÆÃâÃÂÃâÂ
ÃÆÃÂÃÂÃâÅÃÂÃÂÃâÅÃÂÃÆÃâÃâÃââÃÆÃÂÃÂÃâÅÃÂÃâÃÂÃÆÃâÃÂÃâÂÃÂÃÆÃâÅÃâÃÂ:
Past weekend (as usual O_o) we have experienced the issue in our XCP 1.6
production pool.
Shared iSCSI storage was shutted down due to misconfigured UPS settings while
XCP servers continued to work.
When storage was returned to working state and reconnected to pool most VM did
not boot with the same message - VDI is not available.
Googling give me mentioned above method - forgot and reconnect VDI.
Result was even worser - the whole SR become unusable.
Storage rescan gazered lot of errors like bad header on LVM and many other.
Finally i've disconnect failed SR from pool, connect it back and SR become
healthy (it looks so). But anyone VM was not start with disk from this SR and
freeze during startup.
I did not find solution and restored most VMs from backup (long live VMPP!)
So, i just wanna say - be highly careful with VDI on shared storage repository
in production environment)
2013/7/24 Brian Menges < bmenges@xxxxxxxxxx >
Have you tried the following?:
http://community.spiceworks.com/how_to/show/14199-xcp-xen-cloud-platform-xenserver-the-vdi-is-not-available
- Brian Menges
Principal Engineer, DevOps
GoGrid | ServePath | ColoServe | UpStream Networks
-----Original Message-----
From: xen-api-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: xen-api-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ] On
Behalf Of Andres E. Moya
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 09:32
To: xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-API] The vdi is not available
Guys need help trouble shooting this issue
I have an xcp 1.6 pool with 3 machines A,B, and C
I can migrate from A to B and B to A
WE cannot migrate from A or B to C, we also cannot shutdown a vm and start it
up on C, when we do that we get the message The vdi is not available.
We have tried removing machine C from the pool and re joining and still have
the issue.
when we first add host C to the pool it cannot load the nfs storage repository
because we need to create a management interface from a bonded vlan that gets
created after joining the pool. After we create the interface and run a re plug
on the storage repository it says its connected / re plugged.
Thanks for any help in advance
_______________________________________________
Xen-api mailing list
Xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
________________________________
The information contained in this message, and any attachments, may contain
confidential and legally privileged material. It is solely for the use of the
person or entity to which it is addressed. Any review, retransmission,
dissemination, or action taken in reliance upon this information by persons or
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this
in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
_______________________________________________
Xen-api mailing list
Xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
_______________________________________________
Xen-api mailing list
Xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
|
