Re: [Xen-API] Guest Utilities - HVM vs PV mode

[George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 12.02.2013 01:12, Alexandre Kouznetsov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> El 11/02/13 14:52, Pasi KÃrkkÃinen escribiÃ:
> > > Does Squeeze's linux-image-2.6.32-5-amd64 already includes Xen PV
> > > support? I believed it was included since v3.0.
> > > I'm quite sure it's the same stock kernel image, I has the same MD5
> > > hash as a regular Debian 6.0 64-bit installation I have around.
> > Upstream Linux has had Xen domU support since 2.6.24.
> > So yes, Linux 2.6.32 default kernel has pvops Xen PV support.
> I feel like need to go back to school... Have always been using *-xen 
> kernels, even in DomU's.
-xen kernels is still better.

All vanilla kernels < 3.0 can't raise memory over initial value (even 
static max > dynamic max), and time is screwed after migration, and 
MemTotal is not equal to mem_kb for domain... It can works, but we still 
using suse's -xen forward-ported kernels, because they more polished, 
than upstream.


_______________________________________________
Xen-api mailing list
Xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api