[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-API] XCP 1.5 lv cleanup not happening


  • To: George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Ryan Farrington <rfarrington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 19:32:29 -0600
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 01:33:44 +0000
  • List-id: User and development list for XCP and XAPI <xen-api.lists.xen.org>
  • Thread-index: Ac3Cwv4WW4VCwD4DRMiOIp+WzFk+EwADhWNc
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-API] XCP 1.5 lv cleanup not happening

Looks like it extended into 1.5 as well.  Guess this is something I will need to test on 1.6 and maybe submit a bug report to get it fixed..  I wonder why it was added as a restriction.

 

Ryan Farrington

Sr Systems Engineer 
Email rfarrington@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Mobile 972.804.6803
RemitDATA.com
 

This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please erase this e-mail immediately without reading it or sending it to anyone else. I would also appreciate your advising me (by return e-mail) if you have received this e-mail by mistake. Thank you for your assistance.

 

From: xen-api-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [xen-api-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of George Shuklin [george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 4:41 PM
To: xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-API] XCP 1.5 lv cleanup not happening

Yep, XCP 1.1 requirer all hosts to be online to purge VDI's from SR (LVM or NFS, does not matter).

Strangely, XCP 0.5 had no that kind of restriction.


On 15.11.2012 02:08, Ryan Farrington wrote:

A special thanks goes out to felipef for all the help today.

 

History:

                (4) host pool – one in a failed state due to hardware failure

                (1) 3.2T data lun – SR-UUID = aa15042e-2cdd-5ebc-9f0e-3d189c5cb56a

 

The issue:

The 3.2T datalun was presenting as 91% utilized and only 33% virtually allocated.

                               

Work log:

 

Results were confirmed via the XC GUI and via the command line as identified below

                xe sr-list params=all uuid=aa15042e-2cdd-5ebc-9f0e-3d189c5cb56a

                                physical-utilisation ( RO): 3170843492352

                                physical-size ( RO): 3457918435328

                                virtual size: 1316940152832

type ( RO): lvmohba

sm-config (MRO): allocation: thick; use_vhd: true

 

Further digging found that summing all the vdis on the SR resulted in the virtual allocation number

                Commands + results:

xe vdi-list sr-uuid=aa15042e-2cdd-5ebc-9f0e-3d189c5cb56a params=physical-utilisation --minimal | sed 's/,/ + /g' | bc –l

physical utilization:  1,210,564,214,784

xe vdi-list sr-uuid=aa15042e-2cdd-5ebc-9f0e-3d189c5cb56a params=virtual-size --minimal | sed 's/,/ + /g' | bc –l

                virtual size: 1,316,940,152,832

 

At this point we started looking at the VG to see if there were some LVs that were taking space but not known by the xapi

                Command + result:

                                vgs

                                                VG                                                                                                              #PV #LV #SN Attr   VSize    VFree

VG_XenStorage-aa15042e-2cdd-5ebc-9f0e-3d189c5cb56a   1  33   0 wz--n-    3.14T 267.36G

 

(lvs --units B | grep aa15042e | while read vg lv flags size; do echo -n "$size +" | sed 's/B//g'; done; echo 0)| bc -l

                                                3170843492352

 

So at this point we have confirmed that there are in fact lvs not accounted for by xapi. So we look for them

lvs | grep aa15042e | grep VHD | cut -c7-42 | while read uuid; do [ "$(xe vdi-list uuid=$uuid --minimal)" == "" ] && echo $uuid ; done

                This returned a long list of UUIDs that did not have a matching entry in xapi

 

Grabbing one of the UUIDs at random and searching back in the xensource.log we find something strange

                [20121113T09:05:32.654Z|debug|xcp-nc-bc1b8|1563388 inet-RPC|SR.scan R:b7ff8ccc6566|dispatcher] Server_helpers.exec exception_handler: Got exception SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_181: [ ; Error in Metadata volume operation for SR. [opterr=VDI delete operation failed for parameters: /dev/VG_XenStorage-aa15042e-2cdd-5ebc-9f0e-3d189c5cb56a/MGT, c866d910-f52f-4b16-91be-f7c646c621a5. Error: Failed to read file with params [3, 0, 512, 512]. Error: Input/output error];  ]

 

After a little googling around and finally finding a thread on the citrix forums (http://forums.citrix.com/thread.jspa?threadID=299275) that pointed me at a process to rebuild the metadata for that specific SR without having to blow away the SR and start fresh.

                Commands

lvrename /dev/VG_XenStorage-aa15042e-2cdd-5ebc-9f0e-3d189c5cb56a/MGT /dev/VG_XenStorage-aa15042e-2cdd-5ebc-9f0e-3d189c5cb56a/OLDMGT

xe sr-scan uuid=aa15042e-2cdd-5ebc-9f0e-3d189c5cb56a

 

This got rid of the SR_backend errors but the LVs continued to persist.  Started looking in the SMlog started seeing lines that pointed at the pool not being ready and exiting

                <25168> 2012-11-14 12:27:24.195463      Pool is not ready, exiting

 

At this point I manually forced the offline node out of the pool and the SMlog reported a success in the purge process.

                xe host-forget uuid=<down host>

 



_______________________________________________
Xen-api mailing list
Xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
_______________________________________________
Xen-api mailing list
Xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.