[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-API] NFS Storage Performance on XCP


  • To: Xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: ND KK <k110168@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2012 16:09:36 +0800
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 08:10:16 +0000
  • List-id: User and development list for XCP and XAPI <xen-api.lists.xen.org>

Hi All,
I have a problem on NFS storage performance in XCP 1.1
I have run several tests, with commands like this. I average over three tests with the same command:
Write: dd if=/dev/zero of=./test1 bs=4M coubt=1024 oflag=direct
Read: dd if=./test1 of=/dev/null bs=4M iflag=direct

Case 1 :
Storage Server - CentOS 5.6:
2 * 2TB SATAII  7.2Krpm HDD in RAID1 for System
12 * 2TB SATAII  7.2Krpm HDD in RAID10 for NFS
10 Gigabit Ethernet (I have tested it by iperf, throughput = 971 MB/s)
Jumbo frames at 9000 bytes are enabled  (I have tested, this's work) 

The performance on storage (local)  R:650(MB/s)  W:478(MB/s)
The performance on XCP Host (dom0)  R:382(MB/s)  W:466(MB/s)
The performance on VM - CentOS (domU)  R:261(MB/s)  W:364(MB/s)

Case 2 :
Storage Server - Nexenta:
2 * 2TB SATAII  7.2Krpm HDD in RAID1 for System
5 * 2TB SATAII  7.2Krpm HDD in RAID5 for NFS
10 Gigabit Ethernet
Jumbo frames at 9000 bytes are enabled 

The performance on storage (local)  R:3.2(GB/s)  W:2.6(GB/s)  <- cache, can't use dd iflag/oflag=direct on Nexenta
The performance on XCP Host (dom0)  R:753(MB/s)  W:824(MB/s)
The performance on  VM - CentOS  (domU)  R:406(MB/s)  W:442(MB/s)

Why the performance  on VM slow than Host(dom0) so much?
Is't blktap2 problem? or nfs mount options? (If it's NFS mount options, why domU slow than dom0 so much?)
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Xen-api mailing list
Xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-api

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.