Re: [Xen-API] [Xen-users] New name for Kronos? [was XCP 1.5 availability]

["Alex Perez" <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-api-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-api-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of George Shuklin
> Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2011 10:36 AM
> To: xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-API] [Xen-users] New name for Kronos? [was XCP 1.5
> availability]
> 
> On 14.12.2011 21:28, Mike McClurg wrote:
> >> I think we should use the name "XCP" only for the appliance,
> >> and maybe just "XAPI toolstack" for the packages in Debian/Ubuntu?
> >>
> >> Does that make sense? Some people are getting confused about what XCP
is..
> >>
> > I think that does make sense, Pasi. For the Debian packages, I think
I'd
> > like to call them the "XCP toolstack" packages. And for a Debian host
> > with the XCP toolstack installed, perhaps we should just call it a
> > Kronos host? I'd like the name Kronos to drop away, but it seems like
> > the easiest way to differentiate the two.
> >
> > Does anyone else have any suggestions?
> >
> XCP is Xen Cloud Platform, which means it provides ready-out-of-box
> system. This includes every piece of current installation, includes
> xs-tools.iso, pre-created iso sr and other stuff. When we talking about
> toolstack it must be toolstack, not the 'platfrorm'. We can note XCP in
> description, but definitively not in name.
> 
> In our internal documentation I usually call all stuff around xapi
> (includes patched LVM, SM and so on) as xapi-toolstack. I think this
> will make very easy to understand model.

+1


_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api