[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-API] XCP: dom0 scalability


  • To: xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: George Shuklin <george.shuklin@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 21:40:05 +0400
  • Delivery-date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 10:40:38 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=YVUGTWM0NPDTcyzSEEcReiQ5OAqz8jhBr1ZJRBGyYe5PNYkRLlrr7oTR7srAPQKUpv azlZ4Ps8p4S+bdfxMiChMOlqEjw9icFxdjOZNVo9vq+MN9n5dIKt68qhW9kVoddWnVtX Y+kpIR2SoNjcCEG0wla7EstxuGbwmsaxzKLIo=
  • List-id: Discussion of API issues surrounding Xen <xen-api.lists.xensource.com>

And one more...

I think, this is point where we shall think again about XenSockets. They
well be perfect for IDC.

Ð ÐÑÐ, 08/10/2010 Ð 20:54 +0100, Dave Scott ÐÐÑÐÑ:
> Hi,
> 
> I've added a draft of a doc called "the dom0 capacity crunch" to the wiki:
> 
> http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XCP_Overview?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=xcp_dom0_capacity_crunch.pdf
> 
> The doc contains a proposal for dealing with ever-increasing dom0 load, 
> primarily by moving the load out of dom0 (stubdoms, helper domains etc) and, 
> where still necessary, tweaking the number of dom0 vcpus. I think this is 
> becoming pretty important and we'll need to work on this asap.
> 
> Comments are welcome.
> 
> Cheers,
> Dave
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xen-api mailing list
> xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api



_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.