[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-API] [PATCH 2 of 3] [PATCH] xenserver: Kill bond master's dhclient when bringing up bond slave
# HG changeset patch # User Ben Pfaff <blp@xxxxxxxxxx> # Date 1278596006 -3600 # Node ID 017805983e8d424619afbd8e258ed086d11307af # Parent 26f08e08cf3ce4fa91bd4249e0b52c6f6d73345d [PATCH] xenserver: Kill bond master's dhclient when bringing up bond slave. >From fe19e820e4e543ee29b1b159be8ef8ee03947650 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:34:10 -0700 interface-reconfigure is never explicitly called to down a bond master. However, when it is called to up a slave it is implicit that we are destroying the master. The "bridge" version of interface-reconfigure always "ifdown"s the bond master in such a case, but until now the "vswitch" version has not done so. Usually, it doesn't matter, because the bond master network device disappears when the slave is brought up, but one case was missed: for a bond master with an IP address obtained via DHCP, the dhclient process needs to be killed, and we were not doing it. This commit starts doing it (by invoking ifdown on the bond master). The dhclient process that hangs around doesn't cause problems until the bond master is brought back up, at which point "ifup" fails because it refuses to start another dhclient for the same interface. The converse behavior is also important; that is, when a bond PIF is brought up, interface-reconfigure is expected to implicitly take down its slave PIFs. My testing (on 5.5.0) shows that this behavior is already correct. At any rate, this commit does not change that behavior. Bug #2668. Bug #2734. Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <blp@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Dominic Curran <dominic.curran@xxxxxxxxxx> --- ...ensource_libexec_InterfaceReconfigureVswitch.py | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff -r 26f08e08cf3c -r 017805983e8d scripts/InterfaceReconfigureVswitch.py --- a/scripts/InterfaceReconfigureVswitch.py Thu Jul 08 14:33:23 2010 +0100 +++ b/scripts/InterfaceReconfigureVswitch.py Thu Jul 08 14:33:26 2010 +0100 @@ -414,7 +414,18 @@ self._extra_ports = extra_ports def bring_down_existing(self): - pass + # interface-reconfigure is never explicitly called to down a + # bond master. However, when we are called to up a slave it + # is implicit that we are destroying the master. + # + # This is (only) important in the case where the bond master + # uses DHCP. We need to kill the dhclient process, otherwise + # bringing the bond master back up later will fail because + # ifup will refuse to start a duplicate dhclient. + bond_masters = pif_get_bond_masters(self._pif) + for master in bond_masters: + log("action_up: bring down bond master %s" % (pif_netdev_name(master))) + run_command(["/sbin/ifdown", pif_bridge_name(master)]) def configure(self): # Bring up physical devices. ovs-vswitchd initially enables or scripts/InterfaceReconfigureVswitch.py | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Attachment:
txt5GeTy4Gc3Q.txt _______________________________________________ xen-api mailing list xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |