[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-API] [PATCH] Makes the allocator more robust by enabling allocation of 0 bytes


  • To: Matthias Goergens <matthias.goergens@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Dave Scott <Dave.Scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 17:13:05 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 09:13:03 -0800
  • List-id: Discussion of API issues surrounding Xen <xen-api.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcqkIz5kxFzfHRaXRKC4b1TlcCuLbAEnvBTgAAb1Q/AAAPMe4A==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-API] [PATCH] Makes the allocator more robust by enabling allocation of 0 bytes

Hi Matthias,

Unfortunately the patch names don't survive the 'hg email' -- they all appear 
to be named 'xen-api-libs.hg' or something :)

I think I have the patches which apply to stdext/ -- perhaps I'm just missing 
mlvm-refactor. Could you resend?

Thanks,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthias Goergens
> Sent: 08 February 2010 16:47
> To: Dave Scott; xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-API] [PATCH] Makes the allocator more robust by
> enabling allocation of 0 bytes
> 
> Hi Dave,
> 
> The fix to the allocator depends on some earlier patches I have sent
> out.  Shall I put all of them in one big patch?  Or just point out
> which earlier patches it depends on?  The following is an excerpt from
> my series-file.  Do the patch-names survive the publication by email
> somewhere?
> 
> stdext-fun_mapext_opt
> mlvm-refactor
> fun-application
> listext-take-tails
> opt-join
> allocator-fix-zero-alloc
> 
> Matthias.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Scott
> Sent: 08 February 2010 13:29
> To: Matthias Goergens; xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-API] [PATCH] Makes the allocator more robust by
> enabling allocation of 0 bytes
> 
> Hi Matthias,
> 
> I didn't manage to apply this patch. Perhaps I'm missing an
> intermediate patch? Could you send me another version which applies to
> the current tip of the repo?
> 
> Thanks,
> Dave
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: xen-api-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-api-
> > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matthias GÃrgens
> > Sent: 02 February 2010 16:22
> > To: xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: [Xen-API] [PATCH] Makes the allocator more robust by
> enabling
> > allocation of 0 bytes
> >
> > `normalize' and `alloc_specified_area' no longer get confused by 0
> byte
> > allocations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Goergens <matthias.goergens@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > (Mercurial doesn't like Umlaute.)
> >
> >
> >  mlvm/allocator.ml |  66 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >

_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.