[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xci-devel] XCI repositories


  • To: Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Tom Rotenberg <tom.rotenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:54:58 +0300
  • Cc: "xci-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xci-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 09:55:01 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=KnV60OPX93aAyCKYhqGIdP5mXjI1aLshlli2FxRv7ByMYr5cYH/Bqr2+vU37G7/Dz1 XCIi71Tvc3t46FLKIfTNW2us2UvZhXf48Vj8kxqOhfJqVqm5g+/jqS2OKgAi3ibJsI3F ydfQ+zs58dicZS3ork0fkGha/WArwXgzWOqZM=
  • List-id: xci-devel.lists.xensource.com

OK.

I have a few more questions/problems:

1. I'm still trying to build teh XCI for USB, and it's not working for
me at all. Could you please support a downloadable binary or something
like this, which i can just generate the XCI usb from? without the
need to build the whole XCI?

2.  All my builds (on a 32 bit Ubuntu) fail, with the following (last) output:
...
nclient_usb/root/lib/libgcc_s*
mkdir -p /root/xci/build/project_build_i686/xenclient_usb/autotools-stamps
touch 
/root/xci/build/project_build_i686/xenclient_usb/autotools-stamps/gcc_libs_target_installed
wget --passive-ftp -nd   -P /root/xci/build/dl
http://avr32linux.org/twiki/pub/Main/LibAio//libaio-0.3.106-avr32.tar.bz2
--2009-09-22 12:52:57--
http://avr32linux.org/twiki/pub/Main/LibAio//libaio-0.3.106-avr32.tar.bz2
Resolving avr32linux.org... 158.38.152.244
Connecting to avr32linux.org|158.38.152.244|:80...
"

It looks like avr32linux.org:80 isn't alive...
Can u please help me with this?

Tom


On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Vincent Hanquez
<vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Tom Rotenberg wrote:
>>
>> BTW - does the XCI build system, now supports building on a 64 bit
>> machine?
>>
>
> I'm afraid is still doesn't; it could be possible to build a glibc target on
> buildroot that would probably give less problems than the uclibc target.
>
> I think requiring a 32 bits chroot at the moment is the best option. it
> doesn't support
> less features than building on 64 bits anyway (just a bit more pain for the
> setup), so i think our priority for this is pretty low. until we switch to
> openembedded, which we're looking to do at some point AFAIK.
>
> --
> Vincent Hanquez
>

_______________________________________________
Xci-devel mailing list
Xci-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xci-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.