[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Mini-OS: add some macros for asm statements


  • To: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>, minios-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:56:03 +0100
  • Autocrypt: addr=andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx; keydata= xsFNBFLhNn8BEADVhE+Hb8i0GV6mihnnr/uiQQdPF8kUoFzCOPXkf7jQ5sLYeJa0cQi6Penp VtiFYznTairnVsN5J+ujSTIb+OlMSJUWV4opS7WVNnxHbFTPYZVQ3erv7NKc2iVizCRZ2Kxn srM1oPXWRic8BIAdYOKOloF2300SL/bIpeD+x7h3w9B/qez7nOin5NzkxgFoaUeIal12pXSR Q354FKFoy6Vh96gc4VRqte3jw8mPuJQpfws+Pb+swvSf/i1q1+1I4jsRQQh2m6OTADHIqg2E ofTYAEh7R5HfPx0EXoEDMdRjOeKn8+vvkAwhviWXTHlG3R1QkbE5M/oywnZ83udJmi+lxjJ5 YhQ5IzomvJ16H0Bq+TLyVLO/VRksp1VR9HxCzItLNCS8PdpYYz5TC204ViycobYU65WMpzWe LFAGn8jSS25XIpqv0Y9k87dLbctKKA14Ifw2kq5OIVu2FuX+3i446JOa2vpCI9GcjCzi3oHV e00bzYiHMIl0FICrNJU0Kjho8pdo0m2uxkn6SYEpogAy9pnatUlO+erL4LqFUO7GXSdBRbw5 gNt25XTLdSFuZtMxkY3tq8MFss5QnjhehCVPEpE6y9ZjI4XB8ad1G4oBHVGK5LMsvg22PfMJ ISWFSHoF/B5+lHkCKWkFxZ0gZn33ju5n6/FOdEx4B8cMJt+cWwARAQABzSlBbmRyZXcgQ29v cGVyIDxhbmRyZXcuY29vcGVyM0BjaXRyaXguY29tPsLBegQTAQgAJAIbAwULCQgHAwUVCgkI CwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAUCWKD95wIZAQAKCRBlw/kGpdefoHbdD/9AIoR3k6fKl+RFiFpyAhvO 59ttDFI7nIAnlYngev2XUR3acFElJATHSDO0ju+hqWqAb8kVijXLops0gOfqt3VPZq9cuHlh IMDquatGLzAadfFx2eQYIYT+FYuMoPZy/aTUazmJIDVxP7L383grjIkn+7tAv+qeDfE+txL4 SAm1UHNvmdfgL2/lcmL3xRh7sub3nJilM93RWX1Pe5LBSDXO45uzCGEdst6uSlzYR/MEr+5Z JQQ32JV64zwvf/aKaagSQSQMYNX9JFgfZ3TKWC1KJQbX5ssoX/5hNLqxMcZV3TN7kU8I3kjK mPec9+1nECOjjJSO/h4P0sBZyIUGfguwzhEeGf4sMCuSEM4xjCnwiBwftR17sr0spYcOpqET ZGcAmyYcNjy6CYadNCnfR40vhhWuCfNCBzWnUW0lFoo12wb0YnzoOLjvfD6OL3JjIUJNOmJy RCsJ5IA/Iz33RhSVRmROu+TztwuThClw63g7+hoyewv7BemKyuU6FTVhjjW+XUWmS/FzknSi dAG+insr0746cTPpSkGl3KAXeWDGJzve7/SBBfyznWCMGaf8E2P1oOdIZRxHgWj0zNr1+ooF /PzgLPiCI4OMUttTlEKChgbUTQ+5o0P080JojqfXwbPAyumbaYcQNiH1/xYbJdOFSiBv9rpt TQTBLzDKXok86M7BTQRS4TZ/ARAAkgqudHsp+hd82UVkvgnlqZjzz2vyrYfz7bkPtXaGb9H4 Rfo7mQsEQavEBdWWjbga6eMnDqtu+FC+qeTGYebToxEyp2lKDSoAsvt8w82tIlP/EbmRbDVn 7bhjBlfRcFjVYw8uVDPptT0TV47vpoCVkTwcyb6OltJrvg/QzV9f07DJswuda1JH3/qvYu0p vjPnYvCq4NsqY2XSdAJ02HrdYPFtNyPEntu1n1KK+gJrstjtw7KsZ4ygXYrsm/oCBiVW/OgU g/XIlGErkrxe4vQvJyVwg6YH653YTX5hLLUEL1NS4TCo47RP+wi6y+TnuAL36UtK/uFyEuPy wwrDVcC4cIFhYSfsO0BumEI65yu7a8aHbGfq2lW251UcoU48Z27ZUUZd2Dr6O/n8poQHbaTd 6bJJSjzGGHZVbRP9UQ3lkmkmc0+XCHmj5WhwNNYjgbbmML7y0fsJT5RgvefAIFfHBg7fTY/i kBEimoUsTEQz+N4hbKwo1hULfVxDJStE4sbPhjbsPCrlXf6W9CxSyQ0qmZ2bXsLQYRj2xqd1 bpA+1o1j2N4/au1R/uSiUFjewJdT/LX1EklKDcQwpk06Af/N7VZtSfEJeRV04unbsKVXWZAk uAJyDDKN99ziC0Wz5kcPyVD1HNf8bgaqGDzrv3TfYjwqayRFcMf7xJaL9xXedMcAEQEAAcLB XwQYAQgACQUCUuE2fwIbDAAKCRBlw/kGpdefoG4XEACD1Qf/er8EA7g23HMxYWd3FXHThrVQ HgiGdk5Yh632vjOm9L4sd/GCEACVQKjsu98e8o3ysitFlznEns5EAAXEbITrgKWXDDUWGYxd pnjj2u+GkVdsOAGk0kxczX6s+VRBhpbBI2PWnOsRJgU2n10PZ3mZD4Xu9kU2IXYmuW+e5KCA vTArRUdCrAtIa1k01sPipPPw6dfxx2e5asy21YOytzxuWFfJTGnVxZZSCyLUO83sh6OZhJkk b9rxL9wPmpN/t2IPaEKoAc0FTQZS36wAMOXkBh24PQ9gaLJvfPKpNzGD8XWR5HHF0NLIJhgg 4ZlEXQ2fVp3XrtocHqhu4UZR4koCijgB8sB7Tb0GCpwK+C4UePdFLfhKyRdSXuvY3AHJd4CP 4JzW0Bzq/WXY3XMOzUTYApGQpnUpdOmuQSfpV9MQO+/jo7r6yPbxT7CwRS5dcQPzUiuHLK9i nvjREdh84qycnx0/6dDroYhp0DFv4udxuAvt1h4wGwTPRQZerSm4xaYegEFusyhbZrI0U9tJ B8WrhBLXDiYlyJT6zOV2yZFuW47VrLsjYnHwn27hmxTC/7tvG3euCklmkn9Sl9IAKFu29RSo d5bD8kMSCYsTqtTfT6W4A3qHGvIDta3ptLYpIAOD2sY3GYq2nf3Bbzx81wZK14JdDDHUX2Rs 6+ahAA==
  • Cc: samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 10:56:12 +0000
  • List-id: Mini-os development list <minios-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

On 16/04/2024 8:11 am, Juergen Gross wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/sched.c b/arch/x86/sched.c
> index dabe6fd6..460dea2e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/sched.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/sched.c
> @@ -119,20 +113,12 @@ struct thread* arch_create_thread(char *name, void 
> (*function)(void *),
>  
>  void run_idle_thread(void)
>  {
> -    /* Switch stacks and run the thread */ 
> -#if defined(__i386__)
> -    __asm__ __volatile__("mov %0,%%esp\n\t"
> -                         "push %1\n\t" 
> -                         "ret"                                            
> +    /* Switch stacks and run the thread */
> +    __asm__ __volatile__("mov %0,"ASM_SP"\n\t"
> +                         "push %1\n\t"
> +                         "ret"
>                           :"=m" (idle_thread->sp)
> -                         :"m" (idle_thread->ip));                          
> -#elif defined(__x86_64__)
> -    __asm__ __volatile__("mov %0,%%rsp\n\t"
> -                         "push %1\n\t" 
> -                         "ret"                                            
> -                         :"=m" (idle_thread->sp)
> -                         :"m" (idle_thread->ip));                            
>                         
> -#endif
> +                         :"m" (idle_thread->ip));

I know you're only transforming the existing logic, but this is dodgy in
several ways.

First, PUSH/RET is more commonly spelt JMP.  Second, sp is an input
parameter not an output, so I'm pretty sure this only works by luck.

00000000000001ee <run_idle_thread>:
 1ee:   55                      push   %rbp
 1ef:   48 89 e5                mov    %rsp,%rbp
 1f2:   48 8b 05 00 00 00 00    mov    0x0(%rip),%rax        # 1f9
<run_idle_thread+0xb>
 1f9:   48 8b 15 00 00 00 00    mov    0x0(%rip),%rdx        # 200
<run_idle_thread+0x12>
 200:   48 8b 60 10             mov    0x10(%rax),%rsp
 204:   ff 72 18                pushq  0x18(%rdx)
 207:   c3                      retq   
 208:   90                      nop
 209:   5d                      pop    %rbp
 20a:   c3                      retq   


This only works because the address constructed for sp's "output" is
happens to be on a single-parameter instruction where's its good as an
input too.

Anyway, this is a much better way of writing it:

    asm volatile ("mov %[sp], %%"ASM_SP"\n\t"
                  "jmp *%[ip]\n\t"
                  :
                  : [sp] "m" (idle_thread->sp),
                    [ip] "m" (idle_thread->ip));

and also highlights that run_idle_thread() should be marked noreturn.

>  }
>  
>  unsigned long __local_irq_save(void)
> diff --git a/include/x86/os.h b/include/x86/os.h
> index ee34d784..485d90b8 100644
> --- a/include/x86/os.h
> +++ b/include/x86/os.h
> @@ -77,6 +77,17 @@ int  arch_suspend(void);
>  void arch_post_suspend(int canceled);
>  void arch_fini(void);
>  
> +#if defined(__i386__)
> +#define __SZ    "l"
> +#define __REG   "e"
> +#else
> +#define __SZ    "q"
> +#define __REG   "r"
> +#endif
> +
> +#define ASM_SP  "%%"__REG"sp"

The %% should be at the usage sites, not here.  That way, you can use
ASM_SP in e.g. file-scope asm where it's spelt with a single %.

> +#define ASM_MOV "mov"__SZ

There's no need for ASM_MOV.  Regular plain mov (no suffix) will work in
all the cases you're trying to use it, and makes the asm easier to
read.  Notice how run_idle_thread() is already like this.

~Andrew



 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.