[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [UNIKRAFT PATCH v2 14/15] plat/tap: Support tap_netdev_xmit
Hi Sharan, thanks a lot for this patch. There are a few issues in tap_write, comments inline. regards, Hugo On Tue, 2020-06-30 at 11:58 +0200, Sharan Santhanam wrote: > Implement packet send on a tap device. > > Signed-off-by: Sharan Santhanam <sharan.santhanam@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > plat/drivers/include/tap/tap.h | 1 + > plat/drivers/tap/tap.c | 18 +++++++++++++++--- > plat/linuxu/tap_io.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/plat/drivers/include/tap/tap.h > b/plat/drivers/include/tap/tap.h > index 797a62e..648f9ef 100644 > --- a/plat/drivers/include/tap/tap.h > +++ b/plat/drivers/include/tap/tap.h > @@ -48,5 +48,6 @@ int tap_dev_configure(int fd, __u32 feature_flags, > void *arg); > int tap_netif_configure(int fd, __u32 request, void *arg); > int tap_netif_create(void); > __ssz tap_read(int fd, void *buf, size_t count); > +__ssz tap_write(int fd, const void *buf, size_t count); > > #endif /* __PLAT_DRV_TAP_H */ > diff --git a/plat/drivers/tap/tap.c b/plat/drivers/tap/tap.c > index 998b9e8..505f0cc 100644 > --- a/plat/drivers/tap/tap.c > +++ b/plat/drivers/tap/tap.c > @@ -274,14 +274,13 @@ static int tap_netdev_recv(struct uk_netdev > *dev, > rc = queue->alloc_rxpkts(queue->alloc_rxpkts_argp, &_pkt, > 1); > if (rc == 0) { > uk_pr_err(DRIVER_NAME": Failed to allocate the > memory\n"); > - rc = -ENOMEM; > _pkt = NULL; > - goto err_exit; > + rc = UK_NETDEV_STATUS_UNDERRUN | > UK_NETDEV_STATUS_MORE; > + return 0; > } > uk_pr_debug(DRIVER_NAME": Receiving on interface %s(%d) > %p(%d)\n", > tdev->name, queue->fd, _pkt->data, _pkt->len); > rc = tap_read(queue->fd, _pkt->data, _pkt->len); > - > if (rc > 0) { > uk_pr_debug(DRIVER_NAME": Recv pkt size: %d\n", rc); > /* Setting the length of the packet */ > @@ -313,10 +312,23 @@ static int tap_netdev_xmit(struct uk_netdev > *dev, > struct uk_netbuf *pkt) > { > int rc = -EINVAL; > + struct tap_net_dev *tdev __unused; > > UK_ASSERT(dev); > UK_ASSERT(queue && pkt); > > + tdev = to_tapnetdev(dev); > + > + rc = tap_write(queue->fd, pkt->data, pkt->len); > + if (rc > 0) { > + uk_pr_info(DRIVER_NAME": Send packet of size %d\n", > rc); > + uk_netbuf_free(pkt); > + rc = UK_NETDEV_STATUS_SUCCESS | > UK_NETDEV_STATUS_MORE; > + } else if (rc == -EWOULDBLOCK || rc == -EAGAIN) { > + uk_pr_info(DRIVER_NAME": The send queue is full\n"); > + rc = UK_NETDEV_STATUS_UNDERRUN; > + } > + > return rc; > } > > diff --git a/plat/linuxu/tap_io.c b/plat/linuxu/tap_io.c > index 01c9bff..030c192 100644 > --- a/plat/linuxu/tap_io.c > +++ b/plat/linuxu/tap_io.c > @@ -123,6 +123,26 @@ ssize_t tap_read(int fd, void *buf, size_t > count) > return rc; > } > > +ssize_t tap_write(int fd, const void *buf, size_t count) > +{ > + ssize_t rc = -EINTR; > + int written = 0; This is a corner case, but `written` might overflow with very large values of `count`. `size_t written` would be safer. > + > + while (count > 0) { > + rc = sys_write(fd, buf, count); We should write `buf + written` here. If the first sys_write fails, we will attempt to write the first `count - rc` bytes of the buffer (which have already been successfully written) instead of the last `count - rc` bytes. > + if (rc == -EINTR) > + continue; > + else if (rc < 0) { > + uk_pr_err("Failed(%ld) to write to the tap > device\n", > + rc); > + return rc; > + } > + count -= rc; > + written += rc; > + } > + return written; Missing cast here? > +} > + > int tap_close(int fd) > { > return sys_close(fd);
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |