[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Minios-devel] [UNIKRAFT PATCHv5 40/46] plat/common: Implement CPU reset for arm64


  • To: Simon Kuenzer <simon.kuenzer@xxxxxxxxx>, "minios-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <minios-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Wei Chen (Arm Technology China)" <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 06:19:25 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx;
  • Cc: "Kaly Xin \(Arm Technology China\)" <Kaly.Xin@xxxxxxx>, nd <nd@xxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 06:19:36 +0000
  • List-id: Mini-os development list <minios-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
  • Nodisclaimer: True
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
  • Thread-index: AQHUMHkxz7aQpdc17kqnlcPZFYFFVKTruLKAgAAAy4CAAKZZ8A==
  • Thread-topic: [Minios-devel] [UNIKRAFT PATCHv5 40/46] plat/common: Implement CPU reset for arm64


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Kuenzer <simon.kuenzer@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2018年9月12日 4:23
> To: Wei Chen (Arm Technology China) <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx>; minios-
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Kaly Xin (Arm Technology China) <Kaly.Xin@xxxxxxx>; nd <nd@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Minios-devel] [UNIKRAFT PATCHv5 40/46] plat/common: Implement
> CPU reset for arm64
> 
> 
> 
> On 11.09.2018 22:20, Simon Kuenzer wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 10.08.2018 09:08, Wei Chen wrote:
> >> From: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Using PSCI despatch function to call PSCI_CPU_RESET
> >> function to reset CPU.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >>   plat/common/arm/cpu_native.c        | 7 +++++++
> >>   plat/common/include/arm/arm64/cpu.h | 1 +
> >>   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/plat/common/arm/cpu_native.c b/plat/common/arm/cpu_native.c
> >> index 2d1a1aa..429b172 100644
> >> --- a/plat/common/arm/cpu_native.c
> >> +++ b/plat/common/arm/cpu_native.c
> >> @@ -43,3 +43,10 @@ void halt(void)
> >>   {
> >>       __asm__ __volatile__("wfi");
> >>   }
> >> +
> >> +/* Systems support PSCI >= 0.2 can do system reset from PSCI */
> >> +void reset(void)
> >> +{
> >> +    UK_BUGON (!smcc_psci_call);
> >
> > Maybe we should have failed earlier during boot when we failed to detect
> > the mode. Then you could use UK_ASSERT() instead. What do you think?
> 
> Alternatively we could enter a busy loop if we fail to get the mode
> (same for shutdown in the next patch).
> 

I am considering let return directly, and give its caller the chance
to do some remedy if reset failed.

> >
> >> +    smcc_psci_call(PSCI_FNID_SYSTEM_RESET, 0, 0, 0);
> >> +}
> >> diff --git a/plat/common/include/arm/arm64/cpu.h
> >> b/plat/common/include/arm/arm64/cpu.h
> >> index b231d32..c156fd3 100644
> >> --- a/plat/common/include/arm/arm64/cpu.h
> >> +++ b/plat/common/include/arm/arm64/cpu.h
> >> @@ -102,3 +102,4 @@ int32_t smcc_psci_smc_call(uint32_t, uint64_t,
> >> uint64_t, uint64_t);
> >>   /* CPU native APIs */
> >>   void halt(void);
> >> +void reset(void);
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Minios-devel mailing list
> > Minios-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/minios-devel
_______________________________________________
Minios-devel mailing list
Minios-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/minios-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.