[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Minios-devel] [UNIKRAFT PATCH] lib/nolibc: Fix remaining time in nanosleep
Hi Dafna,thank you for this patch. I think you are right, rem shouldn't just always return 0. I went a bit back and forth on whether this is the right way to check for the condition, though; which is why it took me so long to get back to you. After all, the standard says that if "the nanosleep() function returns because it has been interrupted by a signal, it shall return a value of -1 and set errno to indicate the interruption." So it looks like we should check for that instead of whether we slept long enough. Then again, nanosleep is also required to sleep at least as long as requested in req, and rem is then used to potentially sleep for the rest of the time. So semantically, this does what nanosleep is supposed to do, so I think this is fine. There is only one thing that I would change: On 08/27/2018 08:42 AM, Dafna Hirschfeld wrote: Calculate the remaining time to sleep and update the rem parameter if it is given. If the remaining time is larger than 0, it means that the thread was waken up explicitly and nanosleep returns -1 to indicate that. Otherwise nanosleep returns 0 Signed-off-by: Dafna Hirschfeld <dafna3@xxxxxxxxx> --- lib/nolibc/time.c | 14 +++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/nolibc/time.c b/lib/nolibc/time.c index 1c058ae..0787559 100644 --- a/lib/nolibc/time.c +++ b/lib/nolibc/time.c @@ -59,9 +59,11 @@ static void __spin_wait(__nsec nsec)int nanosleep(const struct timespec *req, struct timespec *rem){ + __nsec before, after; __nsec nsec = (__nsec) req->tv_sec * 1000000000L;nsec += req->tv_nsec;+ before = (__nsec) ukplat_monotonic_clock(); I would make this call... #if CONFIG_HAVE_SCHEDuk_sched_thread_sleep(nsec); @@ -69,9 +71,15 @@ int nanosleep(const struct timespec *req, struct timespec *rem) __spin_wait(nsec); #endif- if (rem) {- rem->tv_sec = 0; - rem->tv_nsec = 0; + after = (__nsec) ukplat_monotonic_clock(); + __nsec diff = after-before; ...and these conditional on rem being non-NULL. No need to do this if we don't need the result of these calls. + + if (diff < nsec) { + if (rem) { And this could then be changed to "if (rem && (diff < nsec)). + rem->tv_sec = ukarch_time_nsec_to_sec(nsec-diff); + rem->tv_nsec = ukarch_time_subsec(nsec-diff); + } + return -1; } return 0; } Otherwise, looking good. Thanks, Florian -- Dr. Florian Schmidt フローリアン・シュミット Research Scientist, Systems and Machine Learning Group NEC Laboratories Europe Kurfürsten-Anlage 36, D-69115 Heidelberg Tel. +49 (0)6221 4342-265 Fax: +49 (0)6221 4342-155 e-mail: florian.schmidt@xxxxxxxxx ============================================================ Registered at Amtsgericht Mannheim, Germany, HRB728558 _______________________________________________ Minios-devel mailing list Minios-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/minios-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |