[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Minios-devel] [UNIKRAFT PATCHv4 35/43] plat/common: Implement CPU suspend for arm64
Hi Julien, > -----Original Message----- > From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> > Sent: 2018年7月18日 21:37 > To: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx>; minios-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > simon.kuenzer@xxxxxxxxx > Cc: Kaly Xin <Kaly.Xin@xxxxxxx>; nd <nd@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [Minios-devel] [UNIKRAFT PATCHv4 35/43] plat/common: Implement > CPU suspend for arm64 > > > > On 18/07/18 14:28, Julien Grall wrote: > > > > > > On 18/07/18 10:11, Wei Chen wrote: > >> Hi Julien, > > > > Hi Wei, > > > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> > >>> Sent: 2018年7月16日 21:48 > >>> To: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx>; minios-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > >>> simon.kuenzer@xxxxxxxxx > >>> Cc: Kaly Xin <Kaly.Xin@xxxxxxx>; nd <nd@xxxxxxx> > >>> Subject: Re: [Minios-devel] [UNIKRAFT PATCHv4 35/43] plat/common: > >>> Implement > >>> CPU suspend for arm64 > >>> > >>> Hi Wei, > >>> > >>> On 06/07/18 10:03, Wei Chen wrote: > >>>> Using PSCI despatch function to call PSCI_CPU_SUSPEND > >>>> function to halt CPU. > >>>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx> > >>>> --- > >>>> plat/common/arm/cpu_native.c | 44 > >>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>>> plat/common/include/arm/arm64/cpu.h | 2 ++ > >>>> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+) > >>>> create mode 100644 plat/common/arm/cpu_native.c > >>>> > >>>> diff --git a/plat/common/arm/cpu_native.c > >>>> b/plat/common/arm/cpu_native.c > >>>> new file mode 100644 > >>>> index 0000000..07548bf > >>>> --- /dev/null > >>>> +++ b/plat/common/arm/cpu_native.c > >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ > >>>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause */ > >>>> +/* > >>>> + * Authors: Wei Chen <wei.chen@xxxxxxx> > >>>> + * > >>>> + * Copyright (c) 2018, Arm Ltd., All rights reserved. > >>>> + * > >>>> + * Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without > >>>> + * modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions > >>>> + * are met: > >>>> + * > >>>> + * 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright > >>>> + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. > >>>> + * 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above > >>>> copyright > >>>> + * notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer > >>>> in the > >>>> + * documentation and/or other materials provided with the > >>>> distribution. > >>>> + * 3. Neither the name of the copyright holder nor the names of its > >>>> + * contributors may be used to endorse or promote products > >>>> derived from > >>>> + * this software without specific prior written permission. > >>>> + * > >>>> + * THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND > >>>> CONTRIBUTORS "AS > >>> IS" > >>>> + * AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT > >>>> LIMITED TO, > >>> THE > >>>> + * IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR > >>> PURPOSE > >>>> + * ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR > >>>> CONTRIBUTORS > >>> BE > >>>> + * LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR > >>>> + * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, > >>>> PROCUREMENT OF > >>>> + * SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR > >>>> BUSINESS > >>>> + * INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, > >>>> WHETHER IN > >>>> + * CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR > >>>> OTHERWISE) > >>>> + * ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF > >>>> ADVISED OF > >>> THE > >>>> + * POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. > >>>> + * > >>>> + * THIS HEADER MAY NOT BE EXTRACTED OR MODIFIED IN ANY WAY. > >>>> + */ > >>>> + > >>>> +#include <arm/cpu.h> > >>>> +#include <arm/cpu_defs.h> > >>>> + > >>>> +void halt(void) > >>> > >>> Looking at the usage of halt, I think PSCI CPU suspend is too expensive > >>> for brief idling. > >>> > >>> I am not entirely sure of the semantic expected, but it looks like "wfi" > >>> would be more suitable here. > >> > >> Does timer interrupt can wake up wfi? If yes, I think I can't use wfi > >> here. > > > > Yes interrupt will wake-up the CPU. This is the same with PSCI suspend. > > > > The main difference with the two is the latter will allow you to go in > > deeper state (depending on the arguments you passed). > > I forgot to mention that PSCI CPU_SUSPEND will have some latency. Along > with the states, this is usually encoded in the DT. So if you don't > parse the DT and have some knowledge how long you will likely wait in > suspend state, then calling CPU_SUSPEND will not be the best solutions. > I have commented in previous reply. > Cheers, > > -- > Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Minios-devel mailing list Minios-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/minios-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |