[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Minios-devel] [UNIKRAFT PATCHv4 26/43] plat/kvm: Add trap handler to dump registers
Hi Wei, On 06/07/18 10:03, Wei Chen wrote: Somtimes, for debug purpose, we would like to dump the s/Somtimes/Sometimes/ registers' value while exception happned. This patch add s/happned/happened/ a function to dump registers. Currently, we haven't enable the interrupt controller, so any exception is not expected. So any exception will cause registers dump. Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx> --- plat/common/arm/traps.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+) create mode 100644 plat/common/arm/traps.c diff --git a/plat/common/arm/traps.c b/plat/common/arm/traps.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..49c6813 --- /dev/null +++ b/plat/common/arm/traps.c @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: ISC */ Same remark as before for SPDX. +/* + * Authors: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx> + * + * Copyright (c) 2018 Arm Ltd. + * + * Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software + * for any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided + * that the above copyright notice and this permission notice appear + * in all copies. + * + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL + * WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED + * WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE + * AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR + * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS + * OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, + * NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN + * CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. + */ + +#include <stdint.h> +#include <string.h> +#include <uk/print.h> +#include <uk/assert.h> + +static const char *exception_modes[]= { + "Synchronous Abort", + "IRQ", + "FIQ", + "Error" +}; + +static void dump_registers(struct __regs *regs, uint64_t far) +{ + uint32_t idx; Does this need to be 32-bit? Couldn't it just be unsigned int? + + uk_printd(DLVL_ERR, "Unikraft: Dump registers:\n"); + uk_printd(DLVL_ERR, "\t SP : 0x%016lx\n", regs->sp); + uk_printd(DLVL_ERR, "\t ESR_EL1 : 0x%016lx\n", regs->esr_el1); + uk_printd(DLVL_ERR, "\t ELR_EL1 : 0x%016lx\n", regs->elr_el1); + uk_printd(DLVL_ERR, "\t LR (x30) : 0x%016lx\n", regs->lr); + uk_printd(DLVL_ERR, "\t PSTATE : 0x%016lx\n", regs->spsr_el1); + uk_printd(DLVL_ERR, "\t FAR_EL1 : 0x%016lx\n", far); + + for (idx = 0; idx < 28; idx+=4) s/idx+=4/idx += 4/ It would be nice to define the 28 using a macro. + uk_printd(DLVL_ERR, + "\t x%02d ~ x%02d: 0x%016lx 0x%016lx 0x%016lx 0x%016lx\n", + idx, idx + 3, regs->x[idx], regs->x[idx + 1], + regs->x[idx + 2], regs->x[idx + 3]); + + uk_printd(DLVL_ERR, "\t x28 ~ x29: 0x%016lx 0x%016lx\n", + regs->x[28], regs->x[29]); +} + +void invalid_trap_handler(struct __regs *regs, int32_t el, + int32_t reason, uint64_t far) I am not sure to understand why both el and reason are unsigned. They should never be negative. +{ + uk_printd(DLVL_ERR, "Unikraft: EL%d invalid %s trap caught\n", + el, exception_modes[reason]); + dump_registers(regs, far); + UK_CRASH("PANIC\n"); +} + +void trap_handler(struct __regs *regs, uint64_t far) +{ > + uk_printd(DLVL_ERR, "Unikraft: EL1 sync trap caught\n"); It feels like you want to name the function "trap_el1_sync" to make clear what the use of the function. + + dump_registers(regs, far); + + UK_CRASH("EXIT\n"); +} Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Minios-devel mailing list Minios-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/minios-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |