[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Minios-devel] [UNIKRAFT PATCHv4 20/43] plat/kvm: Add console library for Arm64
Hi, On 07/06/2018 10:03 AM, Wei Chen wrote: QEMU/KVM provide a PL011 uart for virtual machine, so we implement a PL011 device driver library for console. Could we have the PL011 driver outside plat/kvm/arm/console.c? This could be useful for other architecture. Signed-off-by: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx> --- plat/kvm/arm/console.c | 156 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 156 insertions(+) create mode 100644 plat/kvm/arm/console.c diff --git a/plat/kvm/arm/console.c b/plat/kvm/arm/console.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5ee59d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/plat/kvm/arm/console.c @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: ISC */ Same remark as before for SPDX. But this is a bit confusing, some of the code is BSD-3, the other are ISC (not sure what it stands for). What is the rationale behind it? +/* + * Authors: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@xxxxxxx> + * + * Copyright (c) 2018 Arm Ltd. + * + * Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software + * for any purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided + * that the above copyright notice and this permission notice appear + * in all copies. + * + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND THE AUTHOR DISCLAIMS ALL + * WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED + * WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE + * AUTHOR BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, OR + * CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS + * OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, + * NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN + * CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. + */ +#include <string.h> +#include <libfdt.h> +#include <kvm/console.h> +#include <uk/plat/console.h> +#include <uk/assert.h> +#include <uk/essentials.h> +#include <uk/print.h> +#include <arm/cpu.h> + +/* PL011 UART registers and masks*/ +/* Data register */ +#define UART_DR 0x00 + +/* Flag register */ +#define UART_FR 0x06 +#define FR_TXFF (1 << 5) /* Transmit FIFO/reg full */ +#define FR_RXFE (1 << 4) /* Receive FIFO/reg empty */ + +/* Line control register */ +#define UART_LCR_H 0x0b +#define LCR_H_WLEN8 (0x3 << 5) /* Data width is 8-bits */ + +/* Control register */ +#define UART_CR 0x0c +#define CR_RXE (1 << 9) /* Receive enable */ +#define CR_TXE (1 << 8) /* Transmit enable */ +#define CR_UARTEN (1 << 0) /* UART enable */ + +/* Interrupt mask set/clear register */ +#define UART_IMSC 0x0e + +/* Macros to access PL011 Registers with base address */ +#define PL011_REG_READ(r) REG_READ16(pl011_uart_bas + (r)) +#define PL011_REG_WRITE(r, v) REG_WRITE16(pl011_uart_bas + (r), v) + +/* + * Before pl011 uart has been initialized, we user EARLY PRINT UART + * to do early print. + */ +#define EARLY_PRINT_UART_BAS 0x09000000 This should really be defined in a Makefile for a given platform. +static uint64_t pl011_uart_bas = EARLY_PRINT_UART_BAS; + +extern void *_libkvmplat_dtb; + +static void init_pl011(uint64_t bas) +{ + pl011_uart_bas = bas; + + /* Mask all interrupts */ + PL011_REG_WRITE(UART_IMSC, PL011_REG_READ(UART_IMSC) & 0xf800); + + /* Disable UART for configuration */ + PL011_REG_WRITE(UART_CR, 0); + + /* Select 8-bits data transmit and receive */ + PL011_REG_WRITE(UART_LCR_H, \ + (PL011_REG_READ(UART_IMSC) & 0xff00) | LCR_H_WLEN8); + + /* Just enable UART and data transmit/receive */ + PL011_REG_WRITE(UART_CR, CR_TXE | CR_UARTEN); +} + +void _libkvmplat_init_console(void) +{ + int offset, len; + const uint64_t *regs; + uint64_t uart_bas; + + uk_printd(DLVL_INFO, "Serial initializing\n"); + + offset = fdt_node_offset_by_compatible(_libkvmplat_dtb, 0, "arm,pl011"); + if (!offset) + UK_CRASH("No console uart found!\n"); s/uart/UART/ + + regs = fdt_getprop(_libkvmplat_dtb, offset, "reg", &len); + if (regs == NULL && len < 16) + UK_CRASH("Bad 'reg' property: %p %d\n", regs, len); That looks totally wrong to me. What does prevent the DT to have only one cells to describe the address and the size? I would rather implement a bunch of helpers to parse the DT correctly rather than assuming QEMU will always do that. The day, it is slightly changing you are going to be in deep trouble. + + uart_bas = fdt64_to_cpu(regs[0]); + uk_printd(DLVL_INFO, "Found PL011 UART on: 0x%lx\n", uart_bas); + + init_pl011(uart_bas); + uk_printd(DLVL_INFO, "PL011 UART initialized\n"); +} + +int ukplat_coutd(const char *str, uint32_t len) +{ + return ukplat_coutk(str, len); +} + +static void pl011_write(char a) +{ + /* Wait until TX FIFO becomes empty */ + while (PL011_REG_READ(UART_FR) & FR_TXFF) + ; + + PL011_REG_WRITE(UART_DR, a & 0xff); +} + +static void pl011_putc(char a) +{ + if (a == '\n') + pl011_write('\r'); + pl011_write(a); +} + +/* Try to get data from pl011 UART without block */ s/block/blocking/ +static int pl011_getc(void) +{ + /* If RX FIFO is empty, return -1 immediately */ + if (PL011_REG_READ(UART_FR) & FR_RXFE) + return -1; + + return (int) (PL011_REG_READ(UART_DR) & 0xff); +} + +int ukplat_coutk(const char *buf, unsigned int len) +{ + for (unsigned int i = 0; i < len; i++) + pl011_putc(buf[i]); + return len; +} + +int ukplat_cink(char *buf, unsigned int maxlen) +{ + int ret; + unsigned int num = 0; + + while (num < maxlen + && (ret = pl011_getc()) >= 0) { + *(buf++) = (char) ret; + num++; + } + + return (int) num; +} Cheers, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Minios-devel mailing list Minios-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/minios-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |