|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Minios-devel] Single codebase for para-virtualized guests on x86 and ARM?
On 05/04/18 09:38, Ajay Garg wrote: Hi Julien. Thanks for the reply. On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 1:21 PM, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxx> wrote:(+ Stefano and Andre) On 04/05/2018 04:35 AM, Ajay Garg wrote: They are low-end platform with hardware-virtualization (e.g pine64).So why that platform in particular? Is it because you have existing hardware? To be clear, I think compromising virtualization extension is a pretty bad idea. The burden on software will really be huge compare to the current solution on Xen Arm. Cheers, Of course, the benefits of PV need to be really high, to justify the efforts needed to make the required code-changes for PV-support :PHW virtualization support provides good security and performance with limited changes in the guest. Even, x86 community has been discussing to deprecate PV and move towards PVH (very similar to Arm guest). Cheers, [1] https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Archived/Xen_ARM_(PV) -- Julien Grall -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Minios-devel mailing list Minios-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/minios-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |