[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Minios-devel] [UNIKRAFT PATCH 3/4] plat/*: Provide section for library constructors
I'm not sure this is doing exactly the right thing. I'll take the x86 linuxu code as example, but it should apply to the other platforms, too: On 02/12/2018 05:01 PM, Simon Kuenzer wrote: diff --git a/plat/linuxu/x86/link64.ld b/plat/linuxu/x86/link64.ld index a7d642d..3f78b81 100644 --- a/plat/linuxu/x86/link64.ld +++ b/plat/linuxu/x86/link64.ld @@ -56,6 +56,30 @@ SECTIONS { *(.rodata) *(.rodata.*) } + + /* Constructor table */ + ukplat_ctortab = .; + .ctortab : { + *(.ukplat_ctortab0) + *(.ukplat_ctortab0.*) + *(.ukplat_ctortab1) + *(.ukplat_ctortab1.*) + *(.ukplat_ctortab2) + *(.ukplat_ctortab2.*) + *(.ukplat_ctortab3) + *(.ukplat_ctortab3.*) + *(.ukplat_ctortab4) + *(.ukplat_ctortab4.*) + *(.ukplat_ctortab5) + *(.ukplat_ctortab5.*) + *(.ukplat_ctortab6) + *(.ukplat_ctortab6.*) + *(.ukplat_ctortab7) + *(.ukplat_ctortab7.*) + LONG(0); + } + ukplat_ectortab = .; + . = ALIGN(0x1000); _erodata = .; So you put the constructor before the end symbol signifying the end of read-only data. That works as expected: $ nm -n build/build/unikraft_linuxu-x86_64 [...] 0000000000405000 R _rodata 00000000004052c0 r hex2ascii_data 0000000000405300 R _nolibc_ctype 0000000000405c60 R ukplat_ctortab 0000000000405c64 D ukplat_ectortab 0000000000406000 D _data 0000000000406000 D _erodata [...] However, when I look at the sections, ctortab is writable: $ readelf -S build/unikraft_linuxu-x86_64 There are 10 section headers, starting at offset 0x74e8: Section Headers: [Nr] Name Type Address Offset Size EntSize Flags Link Info Align [...] [ 2] .rodata PROGBITS 0000000000405000 00005000 0000000000000c60 0000000000000000 A 0 0 32 [ 3] .ctortab PROGBITS 0000000000405c60 00005c60 0000000000000004 0000000000000000 WA 0 0 1 [ 4] .data PROGBITS 0000000000406000 00006000 00000000000000bc 0000000000000000 WA 0 0 32 [...]That leaves me with two questions: First, is .ctortab supposed to be writable? My gut feeling is no, because it is completely populated at compile/link time, so no dynamicity there. Second, is _erodata designed to point at the end of .ctortab instead of .rodata? Even if .ctortab is supposed to be non-writable, I'm not sure about this one. Also, third: is the alignment of 1 correct? Oh, and one more minor question unrelated to this: why did you not follow the example of the other pointers and started the name with an underscore (and name it the same as the section)? Cheers, Florian _______________________________________________ Minios-devel mailing list Minios-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/minios-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |