[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Minios-devel] [PATCH 37/40] arm64: add the makefile
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 06:00:30PM +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Shijie, > > On 03/11/17 03:12, Huang Shijie wrote: > > Add the makefile for arm64 code. > > > > This patch refers to Chen Baozi's patch: > > "Initial codes for arm64" > > > > Change-Id: I8fab7db2fe0d24d700e8be2dc9477e5812d6643b > > Jira: ENTOS-247 > > Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm/arm64/Makefile | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/arm/arm64/arch.mk | 7 +++++++ > > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/arm64/Makefile > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/arm64/arch.mk > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/arm64/Makefile b/arch/arm/arm64/Makefile > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..f268441 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/arm/arm64/Makefile > > @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@ > > +# > > +# ARM architecture specific makefiles. > > +# > > +TOPLEVEL_DIR = $(CURDIR)/../../.. > > +OBJ_DIR=$(CURDIR) > > + > > +include ../../../Config.mk > > +include ../../../minios.mk > > + > > +ifeq ($(MINIOS_TARGET_ARCH),arm64) > > +src-y += ../setup.c ../mm.c ../sched.c ../gic.c ../events.c ../time.c > > traps.c > > This is really ugly and clearly show the lack of cohesion between arm64 and > arm32. You would not need that if the directory arm where containing only > common code. Okay, I will try to move it to some common place with the arm32.. > > > +src-$(CONFIG_BALLOON) += ../balloon.c > > + > > +ARCH_OBJS := $(patsubst %.c,$(OBJ_DIR)/%.o,$(src-y)) > > +ARCH_OBJS += $(OBJ_DIR)/hypercalls64.o > > +endif > > + > > +all: $(OBJ_DIR)/$(ARCH_LIB) > > + > > +# $(HEAD_ARCH_OBJ) is only built here, needed on linking > > +# in ../../Makefile. > > +$(OBJ_DIR)/$(ARCH_LIB): $(ARCH_OBJS) $(OBJ_DIR)/$(HEAD_ARCH_OBJ) > > + $(AR) rv $(OBJ_DIR)/$(ARCH_LIB) $(ARCH_OBJS) > > + > > +clean: > > + rm -f $(OBJ_DIR)/$(ARCH_LIB) $(ARCH_OBJS) $(OBJ_DIR)/$(HEAD_ARCH_OBJ) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/arm64/arch.mk b/arch/arm/arm64/arch.mk > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..28e1d9c > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/arm/arm64/arch.mk > > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ > > +ifeq ($(MINIOS_TARGET_ARCH),arm64) > > +ARCH_CFLAGS := -D__aarch64__ -DXEN_HAVE_PV_GUEST_ENTRY > > -mgeneral-regs-only -fno-PIE > > Why do you need to define __aarch64__? The compiler should to it for you. Yes. we can remove it. > > Why do you define XEN_HAVE_PV_GUEST_ENTRY? Arm does not have any start_info > page. okay, I will remove. > > Lastly, why -fno-PIE? Steve tested a platform which compile very slowly, and need the -fno-PIE for it. thanks Huang Shijie _______________________________________________ Minios-devel mailing list Minios-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/minios-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |