[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] reg REMUS
Hi All,
Does VM migration could be done from xen 4.0.2 to xen 4.0.1? or vicer versa , where xen installed on
differenct OS? R is there any constraint over migration/live migration?
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Florian Heigl <florian.heigl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
2011/6/24 Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx>:
> The debian distro (squeeze 6.0) 's xen-4.1 has parts of remus (the python
> code) while other
[... snipped standard issues with xen on debian ...]
>
can you tell us which Distro / Xen version you'd think has the highest
chance of success for testing remus?
I figure Gentoo is a safe bet at most times, since it is always up to
date, but that doesn't really help.
Normally I'd want to test on a distro that is at least close to what I
will use in production. :>
But I really wanna spend some days / weeks on testing Remus and right
now I'm at a loss where I could use a non-broken Xen that has a few of
the more interesting features built in.
Maybe you got a recommendation?
which, btw, is outdated.
Sorry for the outdated remus link. One of the remus users has put up this wiki and a full tutorial on installing/running remus (its for 32bit machines though). http://remusha.wikidot.com
Please use it at your discretion :).
shriram
florian
--
the purpose of libvirt is to provide an abstraction layer hiding all
xen features added since 2006 until they were finally understood and
copied by the kvm devs.
--
Raj,
Research Associate,
MIT.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
