[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AW: [Xen-users] Selecting a linux distro for a xen-involved project
- To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: Mauro <mrsanna1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:55:58 +0100
- Delivery-date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 01:56:45 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=punJ3Iz1pDMTogglzWKJiJ/Kl9mXSLxgTdtn6r3nWnS7dLvQba9OVzQntlsvE4GDam Jv2Mhw9kt4Tj/epwQKlfND4C377Y0KXAjIof77E9OymMAAkE3WdNiI8d3c492WTmrwDb QK9MYYmD2bpYQYAC7mGL6D464SHq5kLL5ojZw=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
2009/1/17 <christoffer@xxxxxxxxx>
My wrong! It should be Xen 3.2-1. My intended point was that it's quite
recent - especially compared to Etch, which uses 3.0. Next time, I'll get
the numbers right.
Yes, Lenny is formally unstable. As this was for a development system,
that could be acceptable, but of course not for a production system.
I not agree, lenny is frozen so it can be considered formally stable, I use it in my producion system without problem.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
