[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] (no subject)


  • To: "Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
  • From: "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:42:29 +0800
  • Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 07:45:11 -0700
  • List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AciJBU8DKEO0KX47SyiTNzYgP790RgAAGXxg
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] (no subject)

Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 22:19 +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
>> Yes, but running_on_xen is already there.
> 
>    Will it be there if we only have a kernel compiled with PV KVM
> support?  Are we going to stub out any *_xen_* function/macro in that
> case?
> 
Well, firstly it is harmless, and then do u mean we should also add
CONFIG_NATIVE when building with Xen or KVM?

It is minor, so up to you and Isaku for each of them case by case.
For me I persuade small patch size, and I checked X86 side only have 
2 CONFIG_XEN in common file.

Thx, eddie

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.