[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [Hackathon minutes] PV frontends/backends and NUMA machines
On mar, 2013-05-21 at 11:43 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 21.05.13 at 12:30, Dario Faggioli <raistlin@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I remember such discussion (which, BTW, is here: > > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2012-08/msg00332.html ). > > However, wasn't that supposed to help only in case you want to confine > > Dom0 on one specific node? > > > > That would definitely be already something, but not quite the same thing > > that came up in Dublin, and that George was describing above (although I > > agree it covers a sensible subset of it :-) ). > > I certainly meant to implement both such that multiple nodes would > be permitted. > Well, sure, but then, again, how do you control which (and not only how much) memory is taken from which node? Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |