[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v6 00/21] libxl: domain save/restore: run in a separate process
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH v6 00/21] libxl: domain save/restore: run in a
> Does this mean this series is now ready to go in?
I think so. I'm just giving Shriram a chance to object.
> I did wonder when I saw the incremental patch if some of those internal
> callback pointers could perhaps be properly typed instead of void
> (because they all end up taking the same pointer type), but lets not
> worry about that here.
The void*'s come from the libxc API.
Xen-devel mailing list