[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 13339: regressions - FAIL

To: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@xxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:50:59 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 07:51:37 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 16:39 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> 
> > test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 12 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail
> like 13025
> > 
> But what about this? Have we broken migration now?!?! :-O

This is a long standing failure (fail like 13025 means it has been
failing since then) and isn't considered a push blocker.

We got the push we needed in flight 13352.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 13339: regressions - FAIL
  - From: xen . org
- Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 13339: regressions - FAIL
  - From: Dario Faggioli

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Issue with MSI in a HVM domU with several passed through PCI devices
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] pt_pci_read_config offset issue
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 13339: regressions - FAIL
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 13352: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread