[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2 of 3] x86/mem_sharing: modularize reverse map for shared frames
- To: "Tim Deegan" <tim@xxxxxxx>
- From: "Andres Lagar-Cavilla" <andres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 07:19:57 -0700
- Cc: adin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, andres@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:20:24 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=lagarcavilla.org; h= message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to:cc :reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=lagarcavilla.org; bh=f/46KiNE1unLSc4f/gvazSHfKC0=; b=TOd5lCHV iEOhLKIjOXbl0iBKrMirjjntoN9xHbCVtkABNoFt+kVF9oeUAFh7WUL0WxCKZiUS iQQiBGgRtaaMI+mkTgITNvt4W46VkZvxHqB9i2VnRNJ6wg1wxxRA4EG/XlHp5C53 ftrLRQPPDEhCRSojx9BfMn4C+0Rary5mWAY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=lagarcavilla.org; h=message-id :in-reply-to:references:date:subject:from:to:cc:reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= lagarcavilla.org; b=DMH8DSllk7Gw0Fb/6ipPRqP0RkDcvqmKCw9NNZKs0uDz jusJoFbNSnkq87Pavk7381DlIK41fz1XLWPTB5zLbEUI0a/ZS+NsZMUbZ7NdX3b6 m2iQy9skez/TsDwVP3jAhaBPI+KljkxlfD8Ot0kRa9jc4QF/1CErbVwgM1gI554=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
> At 10:16 -0400 on 12 Apr (1334225773), Andres Lagar-Cavilla wrote:
>> /* Do the accounting first. If anything fails below, we have bigger
>> * bigger fish to fry. First, remove the gfn from the list. */
>> - last_gfn = list_has_one_entry(&page->sharing->gfns);
>> + last_gfn = rmap_has_one_entry(page);
>> if ( last_gfn )
>> {
>> - /* Clean up shared state */
>> - audit_del_list(page);
>> + /* Clean up shared state. Get rid of the <domid, gfn> tuple
>> + * before destroying the rmap. */
>> + mem_sharing_gfn_destroy(page, d, gfn_info);
>
> Moving this mem_sharing_gfn_destroy() around seems like it's unrelated
> to the rest of this patch, which is basically code motion. If so, can
> you put it in a patch of its own?
Sure. I'll split it up but wait for feedback on 3.3 before re-submit.
Andres
>
> Otherwise, pending patch 3/3 being OK too,
>
> Acked-by: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>
>
>> + page_sharing_dispose(page);
>> page->sharing = NULL;
>> atomic_dec(&nr_shared_mfns);
>> }
>> else
>> atomic_dec(&nr_saved_mfns);
>> +
>> /* If the GFN is getting destroyed drop the references to MFN
>> * (possibly freeing the page), and exit early */
>> if ( flags & MEM_SHARING_DESTROY_GFN )
>> {
>> - mem_sharing_gfn_destroy(d, gfn_info);
>> + if ( !last_gfn )
>> + mem_sharing_gfn_destroy(page, d, gfn_info);
>> put_page_and_type(page);
>> mem_sharing_page_unlock(page);
>> if ( last_gfn &&
>> @@ -987,7 +1052,6 @@ gfn_found:
>>
>> if ( last_gfn )
>> {
>> - mem_sharing_gfn_destroy(d, gfn_info);
>> /* Making a page private atomically unlocks it */
>> BUG_ON(page_make_private(d, page) != 0);
>> goto private_page_found;
>> @@ -1011,7 +1075,7 @@ gfn_found:
>> unmap_domain_page(t);
>>
>> BUG_ON(set_shared_p2m_entry(d, gfn, page_to_mfn(page)) == 0);
>> - mem_sharing_gfn_destroy(d, gfn_info);
>> + mem_sharing_gfn_destroy(old_page, d, gfn_info);
>> mem_sharing_page_unlock(old_page);
>> put_page_and_type(old_page);
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel