[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 11 of 18] tools/libxl: fix build errors caused by Werror in disk_eject_xswatch_callback
- To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 11:11:26 +0200
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 09:11:52 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1333444287; l=592; s=domk; d=aepfle.de; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Subject:Cc:To:From: Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=UV5yC8a1bazIjkmpQ4B6MeAv7nI=; b=LytnxTnShG8v2zAnbYBwRaIXiFEwtlhZrChFpL4x8qcpd38/Pg/zBCDbaLB22kVfkIP o9HyAohcxL9XZg/g07ZN8fcSxUbnNvzrXU+JwaOMrNV2zFRS//lh7NVApN5Jt+znDd67j LIJ2ScKzmidwC1zoy+yRI5HG06HSxDqAr1A=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>
On Tue, Apr 03, Ian Campbell wrote:
> [0] Even gcc(1) says:
> -Wno-format-zero-length (C and Objective-C only)
> If -Wformat is specified, do not warn about zero-length formats.
> The C standard specifies that zero-length formats are allowed.
> So quite why it appears that Wall is enabling Wformat-zero-length I have
> no idea, this is a clear gcc bug in my opinion.
Thats what they say:
"<jakub> olaf_: warnings aren't just about things that aren't allowed in
the standard, but about things considered bad by significant amount of
users"
So gcc wont be changed.
Olaf
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel