[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] 4.2 TODO update
>>> On 12.03.12 at 14:42, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 12:11 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> tools, nice to have:
>> * Hotplug script stuff -- internal to libxl (I think, therefore I
>> didn't put this under stable API above) but still good to have
>> for 4.2? (Roger Pau MonnÃ, patches posted)
>> * Block script support -- follows on from hotplug script (Roger
>> Pau MonnÃ)
> Any opinions on whether this, and in particular the block script bits,
> should be blockers for 4.2?
> I don't use block-script functionality myself so I'm not sure how
> critical it is.
> I guess there is always the workaround of doing whatever the script
> would do outside of xl which is why I think (IIRC) I initially put it
> under nice to have.
If it's this feature that you referred to when discussing the "xl
block-attach 0 ..." shortcomings (including the blkback-over-loop
that's currently unavailable with xl), then count this as a "+1"
for this being a blocker - if we want 4.2 to push forward the
deprecation status of xend, then (known) regressions like this
should get eliminated.
Xen-devel mailing list