[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 4/7] swiotlb: Expose swiotlb_nr_tlb function to modules as swiotlb_enabled
- To: konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx
- From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2011 04:05:58 +0900
- Cc: thellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxx, airlied@xxxxxxxx, pq@xxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx, alexdeucher@xxxxxxxxx, airlied@xxxxxxxxxx, j.glisse@xxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 12:07:52 -0700
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:12:47 -0400
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> As a mechanism to detect whether SWIOTLB is enabled or not.
> And as such, we might as well wrap it within an 'swiotlb_enabled()'
> function that will call the swiotlb_nr_tlb.
>
> We also fix the spelling - it was swioltb instead of
> swiotlb.
>
> CC: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/swiotlb.h | 7 ++++++-
> lib/swiotlb.c | 5 +++--
> 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Can we just use swiotlb_nr_tbl() rather than inventing a new function
that only wraps swiotlb_nr_tbl()?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel