[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xen-devel] Re: xen-kernel and EDD
- To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Lin-Bao Zhang <2004.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 18:24:33 +0800
- Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 03:25:31 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BbiDknAqnnoldPAqETGq/rN6+R05tW+BftXvSjRm8NQ=; b=KcsX487/Pc7lIq0DmBbB8f/O0ucQyhTzn9Bf+vxhHMwzlWuE4dkWiy7vOkWXGyK8n8 j8qWMxhvtS/UBnb3HvEe/UJgsv9Zo1sqMipAs4QvKQaC5Bmv7wnAMaDMb4Gd+lO4AlyS D/VogHwvxi6piNgRBYkjHFg0hqgzuhxWFuZSw=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
yes, redhat has adopted this modification:
1. Change BOOT_TRAMPOLINE to 0x7c000
2. In xen/arch/x86/boot/head.S, change the line 'mov $0x98000,%esp' to 'mov
we are testing various cases.
I will update our testing result ASAP.
2011/8/23 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 08/18/2011 01:04 PM, Keir Fraser wrote:
>>> > 0x95400 - 0x90000 = 0x5400 = 21KBytes.
>>> > 21Kbytes is enough for gen.gz running(hypervisor) ?
> The trampoline is even smaller than 21K. The problem is that the stack (at
> 0x98000) is overlapping the EBDA.
> I suggest that you open a support case with Red Hat. We do plan to make
> this change, but the process is much easier if we have an open ticket that
> requests it.
Xen-devel mailing list