[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] xen/pv-on-hvm kexec: prevent crash in xenwatch_thread() when stale watch events arrive
- To: Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 14:30:12 +0100
- Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 06:31:05 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=3UIk15NtXUkRXwmZ3wQYe9e9H6tbBBWSNVr52HrUyxY=; b=c1MhllLIvjYP3gWJItrQjEr//oMJYmGtqg5cOwc8ABzXZspxMCMkn7HIELmjV5bCuq zh2QFPqatI4weuf1c1r/127CoxDsVez+AsUWYThJjTutORjxu3Q9Svxevgl6ztZW0Mbd H+bXw42AlsXpKcxqCvFRay7VRndVvfLUII8oQ=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
- Thread-index: Acxc4cpm5b5frsFF50WemTEXGRCP/A==
- Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] xen/pv-on-hvm kexec: prevent crash in xenwatch_thread() when stale watch events arrive
On 17/08/2011 13:51, "Olaf Hering" <olaf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, Ian Campbell wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 14:16 +0100, Olaf Hering wrote:
>>> During repeated kexec boots xenwatch_thread() can crash because
>>> xenbus_watch->callback is cleared by xenbus_watch_path() if a node/token
>>> combo for a new watch happens to match an already registered watch from
>>> an old kernel. In this case xs_watch returns -EEXISTS, then
>>> register_xenbus_watch() does not remove the to-be-registered watch from
>>> the list of active watches but returns the -EEXISTS to the caller
>>> anyway.
>>
>> Isn't this behaviour the root cause of the issue (which should be fixed)
>> rather than papering over it during watch processing. IOW should't
>> register_xenbus_watch cleanup after itself if xs_watch fails.
>
> Keir, the EEXISTS case in register_xenbus_watch() was added by you 6
> years ago. Do you happen to know what it tried to solve, and do these
> conditions still apply today? Perhaps the EEXISTS can be removed now.
>
> http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/xen-unstable.hg/diff/8016551fde98/linux-2.6-xen-spar
> se/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_xs.c
Bad me. Either remove the EEXIST check, or convert EEXIST to return code 0
in register_xenbus_watch(). You could do either, since I'm sure I added the
EEXIST check only as an attempt to theoretically robustify that function,
and looks like I got it wrong.
K.
> Olaf
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel