[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 7147: regressions - FAIL
- To: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 13:10:44 +0200
- Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 23 May 2011 04:14:15 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1306149049; l=378; s=domk; d=aepfle.de; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Subject:Cc:To:From: Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=rSPd4ZJqf47LGQSy4xQScbhJlUE=; b=ema0PQ1f6QC8u0UA26+2t/oq2bpr16sR6DssQv37Rp7LeI5Iv/oHQXFCB9qMi5DutU5 Hw7w5sOFu8Dh2OfsVR8ytL17HmVw/HNlvdGBHISopZp79ChjwBn6GC8pKLOIoECoMlbiy p97NyveMzCMtuSYxpviCwxVbrGpO25Yrf44=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
On Sat, May 21, Keir Fraser wrote:
> Related to the -Wno-unused-but-set-variable patch. But this is weird because
> the compiler runs many times with this option quite happily, before failing
> on it as an unrecognised option much later in the build (building qemu in
> this case, or stubdom in the case of xen-unstable). Any ideas?
I will look at this today.
Olaf
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel