On Tue, Apr 19, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
Was wondering if you are OK pushing this for 2.6.39-rc3 or whether you are OK
with me doing. It fixes a regression introduced by the last hunk of
5ea5254aa0ad269cfbd2875c973ef25ab5b5e9db
Looking through my backlog, I noticed that the patch went also to
stable@xxxxxxxxxx and is now in various trees already.
So please forward this revert also to stable@xxxxxxx
OK. The upstream git commit is c36b58e8a9112017c2bcc322cc98e71241814303.
Which stable tree did it go through? 2.6.38 only I presume?
All longterm versions, 2.6.32 and up.