[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: do not expose libxenctrl/libxenstore headers via libxl.h
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: do not expose
libxenctrl/libxenstore headers via libxl.h"):
> I guess so. I must admit I thought we had the policy (however
> ill-advised) of tying the SONAME to the Xen version, but I see that in
> the case of libxenlight we do actually have an independent SONAME.
In general I think it's fair enough to bump the soname online once in
each release cycle. But now is as good as any.
> I wasn't sure which digit of the major number I was supposed to
> increment so I went with the first... Perhaps a comment immediately
> prior to the variable could describe the requirements?
I would suggest 1.1. I would normally increment the 2nd number of any
shared library unless it was a complete rewrite or something.
Xen-devel mailing list