[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] regression from c/s 22071:c5aed2e049bc (ept: Put locks around ept_get_entry) ?
- To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
- From: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:48:57 +0000
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 02:50:06 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=AXKOS91QAW3gv9pAflV2uzE+RvOynJ19WZFIy3KbTeTWCo0NymGdagrrUhmbh4v+c2 Ff9ZDrJh5DXl6G+sW40Fl3+SFDyHhBi4WIWjGEDUz7xvNJfyqWEFhVyH//tsya6fu+WM fRPMtGM9HlFKtck1lnPEpv8C22CXdSd717ghw=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 10:47 AM, George Dunlap
<George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I haven't had a chance to test it
> -- can you give it a spin?
I should say, the XenServer version of the patch (against 3.4) has
been thoroughly tested, but doesn't apply cleanly to -unstable. So
the concept is tested, it's just this particular patch that's
untested.
-George
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
