[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl stubdom API cleanup
--text follows this line--
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl stubdom API
> I think Vincent wanted a different API to make memory accounting easier.
> What about extending the current create_device_model API with a
> more explicit stubdom flag, and a way to return the stubdom domid to the
> Also the caller should be able to know in advance the amount of memory
> used for the stubdom: another libxl function could be added for that
> Would that interface be flexible enough for you?
That would address my concerns.
Xen-devel mailing list