[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl stubdom API cleanup
On 09/07/10 09:17, Tim Deegan wrote:
Is it necessary to pull the mechanism out along with the policy though?
Or, if we're taking some mechanism out, couldn't we take _all_ the
Which one do you have in minds ?
The idea of a stub domain doesn't seem like one that
libxl necessarily needs to know about.
yes, indeed. the stubdom create could move as a xl helper.
On the ocaml side reimplementing stubdom create is a trivial composition
of smaller libxl function (create/build/add devs) which are already bound.
Xen-devel mailing list