Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Announcing xen/master: pvops git trees rearranged

[Thiago Camargo Martins Cordeiro <thiagocmartinsc@xxxxxxxxx>]

And what about the OpenSolaris, NetBSD and FreeBSD paravirtualized kernels?!

Who needs the full virtualization?!

:-D

Thiago

2009/9/24 Thiago Camargo Martins Cordeiro <thiagocmartinsc@xxxxxxxxx>

I don't believe that, because the paravirt_ops provides a great virtualization job without the need for a special CPU. There are too many people around the world in this situation...

I don't have too much CPUs with VMX and in all my dom0s that have the VMX flag, I simple disable it in my BIOS.

The mainline Linux with the pv_ops dom0 will arrive some day... for sure!

Cheers,

Thiago

2009/9/24 Andy Burns <xen.lists@xxxxxxxxxxx>

2009/9/24 Christian Tramnitz <chris.ace@xxxxxxx>:

> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>
>> No plans to put anything into .32.  We need to have a solid story about
>> how to handle IOAPIC setup before pushing the rest, I think.
>

> Yes, I guess this increases the likelihood of things being merged...

One potentially disturbing snippet on LWN today ...

http://lwn.net/Articles/353852/

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel