[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] Strange network behaviour
- To: Marco Tizzoni <marco.tizzoni@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:15:28 +0100
- Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:15:51 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=f+2suM1JayDsCr6/EmT2+VVP2D/123f8dkerjB3g/BI=; b=QB3mtJCunFM4ryNpP4oXx4HR0dV7kTbVa1OK9QDoJ9AYCGKOqO3xE+ma+247J4F+4u 2uc4Sm/xKNVT4zOUnOLptPN9h7Dfk56K+cW3GPXzNUrsSTxIYiXi6Xa4MnL0SzRU+89m 0uJRciWQeVvlhlsPAMuI72NqGBFkDDm4Qmemc=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=jAO3RkSyzW4w82qItvfVfQMjNF0xQaBmFVbiNa7xNu8XmDJiihm1UDfHRL4KZLSNhJ orKQr1dt5ZELMROeF62kvbXMd2XFHoRVoChqFFs82Ae0qscu6P7Hq4GRrGgLr/jmrIlu bTvFUZ/SXWsi53EVfMmEkL8FUJmG+pco0T9uM=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
That's a difference of only 0.5%. It is interesting that it's
bi-modal, but I don't think it's very significant. If you're really
keen to just understand where that comes from, you can try taking a
trace and analyzing the results.
-George
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Marco Tizzoni<marco.tizzoni@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:03 PM, George
> Dunlap<George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> What's the granularity of your measurement?
>
> I use tcpdump/tshark to dump e decode incoming packets and I think it
> uses the timestamp from the nic.
> The two gaps are 0.011781 and 0.011731 and they remain constant over
> the time. This is a snap:
>
> # Order AbsoluteTime DeltaTime
> 1 0.000000 0.000000
> 2 0.009734 0.009734
> 3 0.021515 0.011781
> 4 0.033245 0.011730
> 5 0.045027 0.011782
> 6 0.056757 0.011730
> 7 0.068538 0.011781
> 8 0.080269 0.011731
> 9 0.092050 0.011781
> 10 0.103831 0.011781
> 11 0.115562 0.011731
> 12 0.127342 0.011780
> 13 0.139073 0.011731
>
>
> Attached a decoded dump of 10 seconds with arrival order, absolute
> time, relative time.
> Also you can find a graph where this issue is clear.
>
> Thanks,
> Marco
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel