[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] stubdomain conf error
- To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Giorgenes Gelatti <giorgenes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:30:32 -0300
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:30:59 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dNlg481MJb0sUiQNJ7SxkVo9jFoyCYJI0iyekIIRNk0=; b=ipvPs+nuS+apdmqWQlzkPHbNnYLQTOIi2BZvmQdzTk/gJaYvMKvqL2RSgbzWzQsECi BGBtTQqARBDS+nx6mZOxZy4gU7X8vjx2WtybCfgUFnjy7YallAuJ7KKk0sSfeUeYcYCP CrEllLZ9tcGl6q91b1RTPWjCjQO6X6Z/aljLY=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=jceiJoBQnkH6Lb3nu0j2cbNw2m4R2T7oIGAdyNl5MCv30sa/T4xVGkT7yKPI5VgmJy tVn8sFFtX6yC8Y430v+YE3vfW7a/N6nHet+C9YtER/UiYlh99x+NMH2hiy0EOYs6rHZD ArvdHu8gAAEYJMISQMKUiNFnDN//ZJ51sko7k=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Well, I've just find out that I was missing a basic step: running fs-backend.
I couldn't run the stubdomain running it either.
Now i'm trying with xen-unstable and I'm getting this error:
# xm create xmexample.hvm-stubdom
Using config file "./xmexample.hvm-stubdom".
Error: Device 768 (vbd) could not be connected.
File /home/ggelatti/disk.img is loopback-mounted through /dev/loop2,
which is mounted in a guest domain,
and so cannot be mounted now.
Any thoughts on that?
2009/7/13 Giorgenes Gelatti <giorgenes@xxxxxxxxx>
#xen-3.4.0> cat .hg_archival.txt
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009, Giorgenes Gelatti wrote:
> To which version should I apply the patch?
> My version (3.4) doesn't have the lines in the patch.
> I tryed adding the lines to the stubdom-dm but it didn't work.
Uhm.. I couldn't reproduce the issue on 3.4 testing.
If you are using 3.4, which CS is the tip of you xen and qemu trees?
> Should I get the "unstable" version?
The "unstable" version works for me at the moment, you can give it a
Xen-devel mailing list