[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/acpi: don't ignore I/O APICs just because there's no local APIC
doesn't XEN support per cpu irq vector? got sth from XEN 3.3 / SLES 11 igb 0000:81:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 95 (level, low) -> IRQ 95 igb 0000:81:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 igb 0000:81:00.0: Intel(R) Gigabit Ethernet Network Connection igb 0000:81:00.0: eth9: (PCIe:2.5Gb/s:Width x4) 00:21:28:3a:d8:0e igb 0000:81:00.0: eth9: PBA No: ffffff-0ff igb 0000:81:00.0: Using MSI-X interrupts. 4 rx queue(s), 4 tx queue(s) vendor=8086 device=3420 (XEN) irq.c:847: dom0: invalid pirq 94 or vector -28 igb 0000:81:00.1: PCI INT B -> GSI 94 (level, low) -> IRQ 94 igb 0000:81:00.1: setting latency timer to 64 (XEN) physdev.c:87: dom0: map irq with wrong vector -28 map irq failed (XEN) physdev.c:87: dom0: map irq with wrong vector -28 map irq failed the system need a lot of MSI-X normally.. with current mainline tree kernel, it will need about 360 irq... YH _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |