[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Future of xenbits Linux trees


  • To: Kamala Narasimhan <Kamala.Narasimhan@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Genki Kuroda <sfsugar@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 22:26:17 -0700
  • Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 05 Jun 2009 22:26:50 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=eiTUnEQi8O4Wl6vI3jWFVW4w2MMo0WkeHlVl+vwIJINCR1BOGkPchcywvM7UHD+mvn WIodq9i/q+HwXhsMPolkux4d0yreTY7Jf/XCq6NfCZSvibnjpDWWC9fp4W2mIjYVVKb2 FiJQSe/+hOiJkOpCGrMZ5zcs5JmpNep+JgDn8=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Hi Kamala,

I encountered the wmi build issues after applying the linux-2.6.27-pq.git
I have no idea on what happens before applying the linux-2.6.27-pq.git

All I did was:

$ git clone http://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/xenclient/linux-2.6.27.git
$ cd linux-2.6.27
$ git clone http://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/xenclient/linux-2.6.27-pq.git
.git/patches
$ guilt-push -a
$ make --> wmi build issues.

GK

On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Kamala
Narasimhan<Kamala.Narasimhan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Just to clarify - You mean you encounter wmi build issues mentioned below 
> with XenClient Linux 2.6.27 even when you *don't* apply the xen-acpi-wmi 
> patch from XenClient Linux 2.6.27 patch queue?
>
> Kamala
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Genki Kuroda [mailto:sfsugar@xxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 10:48 PM
>> To: Kamala Narasimhan
>> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Future of xenbits Linux trees
>>
>> Hi, Kamala,
>>
>> Thank you for the information.
>> I didn't apply the patch, and I don't have any intention to apply the
>> patch for this issue.
>>
>> GK
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Kamala
>> Narasimhan<Kamala.Narasimhan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > The xen-acpi-wmi patch in XenClient linux 2.6.27 patch queue is tied
>> to XenClient.  I didn't expect this patch to be used outside the scope
>> of XenClient which is why you encounter the below issues.
>> >
>> > Could you please momentarily exclude the patch before pushing the
>> rest or revert it if already applied and then build that branch?  Going
>> forward, I will create a XenClient flavor of wmi.c that won't step on
>> the base wmi implementation and configure the two to be mutually
>> exclusive.
>> >
>> > Kamala
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-
>> >> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Genki Kuroda
>> >> Sent: Friday, June 05, 2009 7:06 PM
>> >> To: Boris Derzhavets
>> >> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Future of xenbits Linux trees
>> >>
>> >> Hello, Boris,
>> >>
>> >> I had the same error, but I was able to compile after commenting out
>> >> the "HACK ALERT" section in /drivers/acpi/ec.c
>> >> More information seems to be in wmi.c.
>> >>
>> >> Who is taking care of this kind of issue? This is my first post...
>> >>
>> >> Here is the patch to show where I commented out.
>> >>
>> >> diff âgit a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
>> >> index 2359480..b2c0221 100644
>> >> â a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
>> >> @@ -387,6 +387,7 @@ static int acpi_ec_read(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8
>> >> address, u8 * data)
>> >> /* HACK ALERT
>> >> * Please refer to wmi.c for an explanation on why we added this
>> hack.
>> >> */
>> >> +/*
>> >> if ( in_query_wmi_event_data == TRUE ) {
>> >> if ( address == 0Ã2b ) {
>> >> wmi_event_data_index = 0;
>> >> @@ -398,6 +399,7 @@ static int acpi_ec_read(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8
>> >> address, u8 * data)
>> >> wmi_event_data_index++;
>> >> }
>> >> }
>> >> +*/
>> >>
>> >> return result;
>> >> }
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Genki Kuroda
>> >> E-mail: genkikuroda@xxxxxxxxx
>> >> Website: http://mulps.wordpress.com/
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 12:53 AM, Boris
>> >> Derzhavets<bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> > Kernel: arch/x86/boot/vmlinuz is ready  (#2)
>> >> > ERROR: "wmi_install_notify_handler" [drivers/misc/hp-wmi.ko]
>> >> undefined!
>> >> > ERROR: "wmi_remove_notify_handler" [drivers/misc/hp-wmi.ko]
>> >> undefined!
>> >> > ERROR: "wmi_has_guid" [drivers/misc/hp-wmi.ko] undefined!
>> >> > ERROR: "wmi_has_guid" [drivers/misc/acer-wmi.ko] undefined!
>> >> > WARNING: modpost: Found 3 section mismatch(es).
>> >> > To see full details build your kernel with:
>> >> > 'make CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y'
>> >> > make[1]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
>> >> > make: *** [modules] Error 2
>> >> >
>> >> > Boris.
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Xen-devel mailing list
>> >> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> >
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.