[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AW: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Future of xenbits Linux trees
> Go ahead! It is really time to stop forward-porting stuff. The time
> much better spent in adding the missing features to pv_ops/dom0. Also
> just after the 3.4 release is the perfect moment for that move, 3.5
> should be able to ship with a pv_ops based kernel then.
I'd vote for that, too. Whatever comes out of that discussion on
on lkml ;o), I guess pv_ops is what will be the outcome. Inside or
the linux kernel tree.
What I'd like to add is that I would prefer a better tagging of the
repo to identify subversion of the kernel that belong to a certain
of Xen, whatever kernel that might be. Fixes and improvements are
so quickly that on the pure user's side the combination can make a
no matter how much effort you put in to keep it independent.
Xen-devel mailing list