> Are you willing to maintain such patchsets? The temporary 2.6.27-xen tree
> made for Novell/SuSE guys is totally unmaintained..
The 2.6.27 git tree and patchqueue under the Xen Client Initiative directory on xenbits is fairly well maintained:
http://xenbits.xen.org/XCI/ To my mind this would be a better default tree for us to use for xen-unstable than the ancient 2.6.18. We obviously want to continue to encourage folk to try Jeremy's pvops dom0 stable tree based off the latest linux release too.
Ian
> I think most of the development effort should be used on getting pv_ops
> dom0 ready for
> mainline, but if you (for example), want to maintain forward-ported patches
> for new kernel versions, it sounds like a good idea..
for the time being.
>
> -- Pasi
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
>
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxhttp://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel