[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] c/s 18470
>>> "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx> 18.09.08 09:39 >>> >Jan Beulich wrote: >> Likewise the calls to cpufreq_{add,del}_cpu() from the CPU hot(un)plug >> paths seem to consider the Intel case only (as the functions >> themselves are Intel specific). > >[Jinsong]: > Not quite sure about your question. I just check the code: > 1. cpufreq_add/del_cpu() is arch-independent, since all arch-dependent >part has been handled by cpufreq_driver->init/exit(). > 2. cpu online/offline path is also arch-independent. > Would you please tell me more clear where is intel specific? In that platform_hypercall.c calls cpufreq_add_cpu() only for Intel CPUs, but the hotplug code calls it and cpufreq_del_cpu() always. This ought to be consistent I believe. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |