[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Accessing the VNC using HVM stub domain - xen 3.3.0


  • To: "Samuel Thibault" <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Marco Sinhoreli" <msinhore@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel mailing list" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Marco Sinhoreli" <msinhore@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:32:31 -0300
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:32:53 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=wNSGlSizR6IOPoBRKIvx/G9ugXS9/3vrLB4P7MxFjJ1oK4uqmibSH+dmJYysY1mOa1 vl4Rnoqxv0gqbReh7V/iJPRnFCbHQjVzf5Kz/nIepFXsXyoMpuFwiJeIc7wUMk0hLtA+ LVqtXOSynW6kT4AAhHu061ZDLwsXvmCT8Fyrw=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

> Marco Sinhoreli, le Thu 11 Sep 2008 16:37:41 -0300, a Ãcrit :
>> Thans again,. Changing the subject, I'm impressed with the stub domain
>>  performance! I did some benchmarks using bonnie++ and netperf and
>> it's better than pure fullvirt machine.
>> * netperf:
>> stub-hvm: 25.99 Kbits/sec
>> hvm: 15.23 Kbits/sec
>
> That's what I measured too indeed.
>
>> In bonnie++ benchmark, the item "write block" is impressive:
>> ....................Per char........Block........Rewrite
>> stub-hvm .....20898..........41857.......21045
>> hvm .............19046..........17462.......19331
>
> Is that disk performance?
Yes, IÂm using sata disks in this bench. I have servers with SAS but
this is in production.


-- 
Marco Sinhoreli
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.