[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] do_callback_op()'s second argument can be const
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 15:44:08 +0000
- Delivery-date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:45:03 -0800
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
- Thread-index: AchZ5F0im9AxbsXXEdyBqQAX8io7RQABJkys
- Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] do_callback_op()'s second argument can be const
On 18/1/08 15:11, "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> I certainly don't see how the chunk below fixes
>>> anything -- doesn't it take two lines to state what took one line before?
>> It fixes the build in the context of the other changes.
> What's the difference between assigning from a variable that is void* and
> assigning from a variable that you have cast to void*? Is this just to get
> round some stupid compiler warning that shouldn't happen in the first place?
> That's why I hate type attributes: const, volatile, and the rest. Stupid
> waste of time.
I removed the chunk and I can't get the build to fail on i386 or x86_64 with
gcc 3.4 or gcc 4.1. Perhaps you build with more anal gcc warning settings?
Xen-devel mailing list